Literature DB >> 23966563

Point: cervical cancer screening guidelines should consider observational data on screening efficacy in older women.

Alison S Rustagi, Aruna Kamineni, Noel S Weiss.   

Abstract

Recent guidelines from the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology recommend cessation of cervical cancer screening at age 65 years for women with an "adequate" history of negative Papanicolaou smears. In our view, those who formulated these guidelines did not consider a growing body of evidence from nonrandomized studies that provides insight into the efficacy of cervical cancer screening among older women. First, older women are not at indefinitely low risk following negative screening results. Second, recent data from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden suggest that screening of older women is associated with substantial reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality, even among previously screened women. It may be that after consideration of the reduced incidence of (and reduced mortality from) cervical cancer that may result from screening older women, the harms and economic costs of screening will be judged to outweigh its benefits. However, it is essential to consider the now-documented benefits of cervical screening when formulating screening guidelines for older women, and recommendations that do not do so will lack an evidence base.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papanicolaou smear; cervical cancer; health policy; screening; women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966563      PMCID: PMC3783100          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  17 in total

1.  Frequency of cervical smear abnormalities within 3 years of normal cytology.

Authors:  G F Sawaya; K Kerlikowske; N C Lee; G Gildengorin; A E Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Screening for squamous cervical cancer--the duration of low risk following negative results in cervical cytology test: introduction. IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1986

4.  A long-term prospective study of type-specific human papillomavirus infection and risk of cervical neoplasia among 20,000 women in the Portland Kaiser Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Andrew G Glass; Nicolas Wentzensen; Brenda B Rush; Philip E Castle; David R Scott; Julie Buckland; Mark E Sherman; Greg Rydzak; Peter Kirk; Attila T Lorincz; Sholom Wacholder; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  [Is there a benefit to continue pap smear screening for cervical cancer after 65 years of age? A retrospective study on 53,644 women].

Authors:  Raphaël Meyer; Anne-Lise Lemay; Xavier Guy; Céline Giraud; Patrice Mathevet; Marie Flori
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 1.276

6.  Behavioral/lifestyle and immunologic factors associated with HPV infection among women older than 45 years.

Authors:  Paula González; Allan Hildesheim; Ana Cecilia Rodríguez; Mark Schiffman; Carolina Porras; Sholom Wacholder; Alfonso García Piñeres; Ligia A Pinto; Robert D Burk; Rolando Herrero
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study.

Authors:  Grainne Flannelly; John Monaghan; Maggie Cruickshank; Ian Duncan; Jane Johnson; Joe Jordan; Marion Campbell; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Bengt Andrae; Therese M-L Andersson; Paul C Lambert; Levent Kemetli; Lena Silfverdal; Björn Strander; Walter Ryd; Joakim Dillner; Sven Törnberg; Pär Sparén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data.

Authors:  Peter Sasieni; Alejandra Castanon; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

10.  Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories.

Authors:  P Sasieni; J Adams; J Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cervical screening at age 50-64 years and the risk of cervical cancer at age 65 years and older: population-based case control study.

Authors:  Alejandra Castañón; Rebecca Landy; Jack Cuzick; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 11.069

2.  Cervical cancer screening in older women: new evidence and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  Anne F Rositch; Michelle I Silver; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Influence of HIV/AIDS on Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study From Tanzania.

Authors:  Ramadhani S Chambuso; Stephen Shadrack; Salum J Lidenge; Ntoli Mwakibete; Rui M Medeiros
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

4.  Absolute risks of cervical precancer among women who fulfill exiting guidelines based on HPV and cytology cotesting.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Mark Schiffman; Peter D Sasieni; Li C Cheung; Hormuzd A Katki; Greg Rydzak; Nicolas Wentzensen; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter K Kinney; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Expanding the upper age limit for cervical cancer screening: a protocol for a nationwide non-randomised intervention study.

Authors:  Mette Tranberg; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Klara Miriam Elfström; Anne Hammer; Jan Blaakær; Mary Holten Bennetsen; Jørgen Skov Jensen; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.