Literature DB >> 23966366

Incidental findings in computed tomographic angiography for planning percutaneous aortic valve replacement: advanced age, increased cancer prevalence?

Hubert Gufler1, Christian G Schulze, Sabine Wagner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased age is linked with a higher cancer risk according to model calculations. Patients with severe atherosclerotic aortic stenosis are of old age, therefore, a high incidence of malignancies should be found.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of clinically significant and potentially malignant incidental findings at computed tomographic angiography (CTA) performed in patients with severe aortic stenosis being assessed as to their suitability for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 2008 and April 2010, CTA of the thoraco-abdominal aorta and the pelvic arterial vessels was performed in 131 patients. There were 62 women (47%) and 69 men (53%); the mean age was 81.6 years (range, 64-91 years). Incidental findings were recorded and categorized as potentially malignant, clinically significant, and clinically insignificant. Clinically significant findings were defined as those requiring immediate therapy, intervention or imaging, or follow-up examination.
RESULTS: Of the 131 study patients, 31 (23.7%) presented significant extravascular incidental findings, 19 (14.5%) in the thorax, and 12 (9.2%) in the abdomen. Five lesions (3.8%) were considered potentially malignant, three of them (2.3%) were new and highly suspicious for malignancies (two renal cell carcinomas and one hepatocellular carcinoma). In two patients (1.5%) mediastinal lymphadenopathy was found (recurrent malignant lymphoma und new metastases from known bladder cancer).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of highly suspicious malignant incidental findings in patients undergoing TAVR is 3.8% with an average age of 81.6 years which is not high compared to prevalence in the literature dealing with patients aged <70 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT angiography; aortic valve replacement; incidental findings

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966366     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113500164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

1.  Clinical and economic consequences of non-cardiac incidental findings detected on cardiovascular computed tomography performed prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Alistair C Lindsay; Mona Sriharan; Olga Lazoura; Arunashis Sau; Michael Roughton; Richard J Jabbour; Carlo Di Mario; Simon W Davies; Neil E Moat; Simon P G Padley; Michael B Rubens; Edward D Nicol
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Incidental findings in multislice computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: frequency, clinical relevance and outcome.

Authors:  Teresa Trenkwalder; Anna Lena Lahmann; Magdalena Nowicka; Costanza Pellegrini; Tobias Rheude; N Patrick Mayr; Stephanie Voss; Sabine Bleiziffer; Rüdiger Lange; Michael Joner; Albert M Kasel; Adnan Kastrati; Heribert Schunkert; Oliver Husser; Martin Hadamitzky; Christian Hengstenberg
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  The Onco-cardiologist Dilemma: to Implant, to Defer, or to Avoid Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Cancer Patients with Aortic Stenosis?

Authors:  Serban Mihai Balanescu; Dinu Valentin Balanescu; Teodora Donisan; Eric H Yang; Nicolas Palaskas; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Saamir Hassan; Peter Kim; Mehmet Cilingiroglu; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Biswajit Kar; Cezar Iliescu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Frequency and impact of incidental findings on computed tomography during work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: single centre experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan Hinton; Sam Gough; Hanad Ahmed; Lavinia Gabara; John Rawlins; Alison Calver; Benoy N Shah; Dhrubo Rakhit; James Shambrook; Stephen Harden; Charles Peebles; Ausami Abbas; Nick Curzen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Two-year survival of patients screened for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with potentially malignant incidental findings in initial body computed tomography.

Authors:  Peter Stachon; Klaus Kaier; Simone Milde; Gregor Pache; Stefan Sorg; Matthias Siepe; Constantin von zur Mühlen; Andreas Zirlik; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Mathias Langer; Manfred Zehender; Christoph Bode; Jochen Reinöhl
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Non-Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Incidental Findings in Patients Who Underwent Transaortic Valve Implantation Procedure.

Authors:  Ahmed Fathala; Mnahi Bin Saeedan; Ali Zulfiqar; Hani Al Sergani
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2017-03-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.