Literature DB >> 23966140

Chester step test: assessment of functional capacity and magnitude of cardiorespiratory response in patients with COPD and healthy subjects.

Manuela Karloh, Krislainy S Corrêa, Letícia Q Martins, Cintia L P Araujo, Darlan L Matte, Anamaria F Mayer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: the assessment of functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been performed by simple and easy to apply methods that mimic everyday activities, such as the Chester step test (TChester).
OBJECTIVES: to investigate whether TChester is able to differentiate functional capacity and the magnitude of cardiorespiratory response of patients with COPD from healthy subjects; and to compare it with the cardiorespiratory response induced by shuttle test (TShuttle) and six-minute walk test (6MWT).
METHOD: 10 patients with COPD (64±10 years, and forced expiratory volume at the first second - FEV1 38.1±11.8% predicted) and 10 healthy subjects (63±7 years, and FEV1 of 95.8±18.0% predicted) underwent evaluation of pulmonary function, functional status and capacity (6MWT, TShuttle and TChester).
RESULTS: COPD patients had worst performance in all tests, when compared to healthy subjects (TChester 2,1±0,9 vs. 4,1±1,1 completed levels; TC6min: 435±105,1 vs. 593±87,3 m; TShuttle 251±84,6 vs. 436±55,4 m; p<0.05). TChester correlated with TShuttle and 6MWT (r =0.67 and 0.83, respectively, p<0.05). There were no differences in heart rate and dyspnea in TChester levels between groups (p>0.05). SpO2 was lower in COPD patients since the first TChester level (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: TChester is valid in the assessment of functional capacity of COPD patients, being able to distinguish them from healthy subjects, inducing similar cardiovascular demand and greater desaturation in COPD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966140     DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther        ISSN: 1413-3555            Impact factor:   3.377


  5 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a new incremental step test for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Rui Vilarinho; Lúcia Serra; Ana Águas; Carlos Alves; Pedro Matos Silva; Cátia Caneiras; António Mesquita Montes
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2022-04

2.  Comparison of different field tests to assess the physical capacity of post-COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  R Peroy-Badal; A Sevillano-Castaño; R Torres-Castro; P García-Fernández; J L Maté-Muñoz; C Dumitrana; E Sánchez Rodriguez; M J de Frutos Lobo; J Vilaró
Journal:  Pulmonology       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 3.  Functional Status Assessment of Patients With COPD: A Systematic Review of Performance-Based Measures and Patient-Reported Measures.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Honghe Li; Ning Ding; Ningning Wang; Deliang Wen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Home-based or remote exercise testing in chronic respiratory disease, during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A rapid review.

Authors:  Anne E Holland; Carla Malaguti; Mariana Hoffman; Aroub Lahham; Angela T Burge; Leona Dowman; Anthony K May; Janet Bondarenko; Marnie Graco; Gabriella Tikellis; Joanna Yt Lee; Narelle S Cox
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.444

5.  Measurement properties of step tests for exercise capacity in COPD: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rui Vilarinho; Cátia Caneiras; António Mesquita Montes
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.477

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.