Literature DB >> 23964898

Risks (and benefits) in comparative effectiveness research trials.

Chris Feudtner1, Mark Schreiner, John D Lantos.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23964898     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1309322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Patients' Views Concerning Research on Medical Practices: Implications for Consent.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Juli M Bollinger; Kathleen M Brelsford; Travis J Crayton; Rachel J Topazian; Nancy E Kass; Laura M Beskow; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-11-16

2.  Practical steps to identifying the research risk of pragmatic trials.

Authors:  Scott Yh Kim; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.599

3.  A framework for analysis of research risks and benefits to participants in standard of care pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie C Chen; Scott Yh Kim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Monitoring the Impact of Aggressive Glycemic Intervention during Critical Care after Cardiac Surgery with a Glycemic Expert System for Nurse-Implemented Euglycemia: The MAGIC GENIE Project.

Authors:  R Harsha Rao; Peter L Perreiah; Candace A Cunningham
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03

5.  Comparative effectiveness research for the clinician researcher: a framework for making a methodological design choice.

Authors:  Cylie M Williams; Elizabeth H Skinner; Alicia M James; Jill L Cook; Steven M McPhail; Terry P Haines
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock: a propensity score matched efficiency retrospective cohort study in the VASST coordinating center hospital.

Authors:  James A Russell; Hugh Wellman; Keith R Walley
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-11-16

7.  Reporting and transparent research practices in sports medicine and orthopaedic clinical trials: a meta-research study.

Authors:  Robert Schulz; Georg Langen; Robert Prill; Michael Cassel; Tracey L Weissgerber
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Comparison of conventional medicine, TCM treatment, and combination of both conventional medicine and TCM treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: study protocol of a randomized comparative effectiveness research trial.

Authors:  Jian-Sheng Li; Yang Xie; Su-Yun Li; Xue-Qing Yu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.

Authors:  Cory E Goldstein; Charles Weijer; Jamie C Brehaut; Dean A Fergusson; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Austin R Horn; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.