Literature DB >> 23964794

The past, present and future of minimally invasive spine surgery: a review and speculative outlook.

Uwe Spetzger1, Andrej Von Schilling, Gerd Winkler, Jürgen Wahrburg, Alexander König.   

Abstract

In the last 25 years of spinal surgery, tremendous improvements have been made. The development of smart technologies with the overall aim of reducing surgical trauma has resulted in the concept of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Enhancements in microsurgery, endoscopy and various percutaneous techniques, as well as improvement of implant materials, have proven to be milestones. The advancement of training of spine surgeons and the integration of image guidance with precise intraoperative imaging, computer- and robot-assisted treatment modalities constitute the era of reducing treatment morbidity in spinal surgery. This progress has led to the present era of preserving spinal function. The promise of the continuing evolution of spinal surgery, the era of restoring spinal function, already appears on the horizon. The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery is the result of a long-lasting and consecutive development of smart technologies, along with stringent surgical training practices and the improvement of instruments and techniques. However, much effort in research and development is still mandatory to establish, maintain and evolve minimally invasive spine surgery. The education and training of the next generation of highly specialized spine surgeons is another key point. This paper will give an overview of surgical techniques and methods of the past 25 years, examine what is in place today, and suggest a projection for spine surgery in the coming 25 years by drawing a connection from the past to the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23964794     DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2013.821414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol        ISSN: 1364-5706            Impact factor:   2.442


  4 in total

1.  Mast Quadrant-assisted minimally invasive modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single incision versus double incision.

Authors:  Xin-Lei Xia; Hong-Li Wang; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Li-Xun Wang; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Clinical Efficacy and Rehabilitation of Microscopic "Over the Top" for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Bin Lv; Sixin Sun; Haosheng Wang; Li Xiao; Tao Xu; Peng Ji; Jishan Yuan; Hua Ding; Jun Xie; Nan Meng; Lei Zhang; Minjie Hu; Qinyi Jiang; Lei Wang; Xiang Yao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Successful treatment of continuous ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the lumbar spine using percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic spinal decompression: a case report.

Authors:  Yuexin Tong; Zhangheng Huang; Zhiyi Fan; Chengliang Zhao; Youxin Song
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 4.  The Three Laws of Neurorobotics: A Review on What Neurorehabilitation Robots Should Do for Patients and Clinicians.

Authors:  Marco Iosa; Giovanni Morone; Andrea Cherubini; Stefano Paolucci
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 1.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.