OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effects of enamel demineralization, microabrasion therapy and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel surfaces and enamel color. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty freshly extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were allocated to one of the four groups. Brackets were bonded directly to non-demineralized enamel surfaces in Group I (control group), directly to the demineralized enamel surfaces in Group II, to demineralized enamel surfaces after CPP-ACP application in Group III and to demineralized enamel surfaces after microabrasion therapy in Group IV. The samples were stored in water for 24 h at 37°C and then underwent thermocycling. The SBS in megapascals (MPa) was determined by a shear test with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed and failure types were classified with modified adhesive remnant index scores. The data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), Tukey and chi-square tests at the α = 0.05 level. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among the four groups (F = 21.57, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found between Group I and III (17.12 ± 2.84 and 15.08 ± 3.42 MPa, respectively) or between Group III and IV (12.82 ± 2.64 MPa). The lowest SBS value was determined in Group II (5.88 ± 2.12 MPa). Enamel demineralization, microabrasion therapy and CPP-ACP application affected enamel color significantly. CONCLUSION: CPP-ACP application and microabrasion therapy are able to increase the decreased SBS of orthodontic brackets because of enamel demineralization.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effects of enamel demineralization, microabrasion therapy and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel surfaces and enamel color. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty freshly extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were allocated to one of the four groups. Brackets were bonded directly to non-demineralized enamel surfaces in Group I (control group), directly to the demineralized enamel surfaces in Group II, to demineralized enamel surfaces after CPP-ACP application in Group III and to demineralized enamel surfaces after microabrasion therapy in Group IV. The samples were stored in water for 24 h at 37°C and then underwent thermocycling. The SBS in megapascals (MPa) was determined by a shear test with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed and failure types were classified with modified adhesive remnant index scores. The data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), Tukey and chi-square tests at the α = 0.05 level. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among the four groups (F = 21.57, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found between Group I and III (17.12 ± 2.84 and 15.08 ± 3.42 MPa, respectively) or between Group III and IV (12.82 ± 2.64 MPa). The lowest SBS value was determined in Group II (5.88 ± 2.12 MPa). Enamel demineralization, microabrasion therapy and CPP-ACP application affected enamel color significantly. CONCLUSION:CPP-ACP application and microabrasion therapy are able to increase the decreased SBS of orthodontic brackets because of enamel demineralization.