PURPOSE: To estimate the rate of hypersensitivity reactions per 100,000 prescription dispensings of fluoroquinolones based on care rendered in a nationally representative sample of US hospital emergency departments (ED). METHODS: We analyzed the frequency of fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance system (2004-2010) in conjunction with US retail outpatient prescription data from IMS Health (2004-2010). We further categorized reaction severity into three subgroups (mild, moderate, and severe). RESULTS: Based on 1422 cases of fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions and national drug utilization projections, we estimated risk of hypersensitivity reactions for moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. The absolute risk of a fluoroquinolone-related hypersensitivity reaction of any severity was low (44.0 (95% CI 34.8-53.3) ED visits/100,000 prescriptions); however, we identified a statistically significant difference in the relative risk (rate ratios) of seeking care in an ED attributed to moxifloxacin hypersensitivity compared to either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. For all reaction severities, the estimated ED visits/100,000 prescriptions were 141.3 (95% CI 99.9-182.7) for moxifloxacin, 40.8 (95% CI 31.5-50.0) for levofloxacin, and 26.3 (95% CI 20.8-31.9) for ciprofloxacin. When the rates were stratified by reaction severity category (mild or moderate-severe), moxifloxacin continued to be implicated in more ED visits per 100,000 prescriptions dispensed than either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION: Fluoroquinolones may cause hypersensitivity reactions requiring care in an ED, and relative to use, the rate of moxifloxacin-related hypersensitivity reactions is higher compared to levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
PURPOSE: To estimate the rate of hypersensitivity reactions per 100,000 prescription dispensings of fluoroquinolones based on care rendered in a nationally representative sample of US hospital emergency departments (ED). METHODS: We analyzed the frequency of fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance system (2004-2010) in conjunction with US retail outpatient prescription data from IMS Health (2004-2010). We further categorized reaction severity into three subgroups (mild, moderate, and severe). RESULTS: Based on 1422 cases of fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions and national drug utilization projections, we estimated risk of hypersensitivity reactions for moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. The absolute risk of a fluoroquinolone-related hypersensitivity reaction of any severity was low (44.0 (95% CI 34.8-53.3) ED visits/100,000 prescriptions); however, we identified a statistically significant difference in the relative risk (rate ratios) of seeking care in an ED attributed to moxifloxacinhypersensitivity compared to either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. For all reaction severities, the estimated ED visits/100,000 prescriptions were 141.3 (95% CI 99.9-182.7) for moxifloxacin, 40.8 (95% CI 31.5-50.0) for levofloxacin, and 26.3 (95% CI 20.8-31.9) for ciprofloxacin. When the rates were stratified by reaction severity category (mild or moderate-severe), moxifloxacin continued to be implicated in more ED visits per 100,000 prescriptions dispensed than either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION:Fluoroquinolones may cause hypersensitivity reactions requiring care in an ED, and relative to use, the rate of moxifloxacin-related hypersensitivity reactions is higher compared to levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: N Blanca-López; A Ariza; I Doña; C Mayorga; M I Montañez; J Garcia-Campos; F Gomez; C Rondón; M Blanca; M J Torres Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Catherine B Johannes; Najat Ziyadeh; John D Seeger; Ed Tucker; Christoph Reiter; Gerald Faich Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Andrew I Geller; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Nadine Shehab; Lauri A Hicks; Mathew R P Sapiano; Daniel S Budnitz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cynthia L Gong; Kenneth M Zangwill; Joel W Hay; Daniella Meeker; Jason N Doctor Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thomas M File; Elizabeth Alexander; Lisa Goldberg; Anita F Das; Christian Sandrock; Susanne Paukner; Gregory J Moran Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Ivan Lo Giudice; Eleonora Mocciaro; Claudia Giardina; Maria Antonietta Barbieri; Giuseppe Cicala; Maria Gioffrè-Florio; Giuseppe Carpinteri; Aulo Di Grande; Edoardo Spina; Vincenzo Arcoraci; Paola Maria Cutroneo Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 2.483