Literature DB >> 23963276

Predictors of the incident metabolic syndrome in healthy obese subjects: a decade of follow-up from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

F Hosseinpanah1, P Nazeri1, S Ghareh2, M Tohidi3, F Azizi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: There is limited data from long-term prospective studies on the natural course of metabolic syndrome (MetS) incidence in healthy obese phenotypes. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of the MetS in healthy obese subjects without the MetS at baseline after a decade of follow-up. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 438 obese subjects free from MetS at baseline, aged ≥20 years, were selected from among the participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study and followed up for 10 years for development of MetS. Based on national data, central obesity was defined as waist circumference cutoff point of 89 cm for men and 91 cm for women.
RESULTS: Initially, subjects had a mean age of 41.1 ± 11.8 years and a body mass index of 32.7 ± 2.7 kg/m(2). At the end of follow-up, the cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of MetS was 44.0 (36.8-51.1)%. In the multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratios of hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and insulin resistance for the development of MetS were 3.08 (1.39-6.79), 2.84 (1.26-6.42), 6.49 (3.18-13.25) and 2.87 (1.55-5.32), respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of all the components was significantly higher than various combinations of MetS components, except for the two models including combinations of three components, that is, triglycerides (TGs), HDL-C and fasting blood sugar, as well as, TGs, HDL-C and systolic blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that MetS developed in nearly half of the individuals during the 10 years of follow-up. Predictors of MetS in healthy obese subjects may differ from the general population, and waist circumference does not have an independent role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963276     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  29 in total

Review 1.  Use and abuse of HOMA modeling.

Authors:  Tara M Wallace; Jonathan C Levy; David R Matthews
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Metabolic normality in overweight and obese subjects. Which parameters? Which risks?

Authors:  Z Pataky; V Makoundou; P Nilsson; R S Gabriel; K Lalic; E Muscelli; A Casolaro; A Golay; E Bobbioni-Harsch
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Diagnostic values of metabolic syndrome definitions for detection of insulin resistance: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS).

Authors:  Farhad Hosseinpanah; Shiva Borzooei; Maryam Barzin; Marjan Farshadi; Farzaneh Sarvghadi; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.354

4.  Predictive power of the components of metabolic syndrome in its development: a 6.5-year follow-up in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS).

Authors:  Z Heidari; F Hosseinpanah; Y Mehrabi; M Safarkhani; F Azizi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Normal weight obesity: a risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular mortality.

Authors:  Abel Romero-Corral; Virend K Somers; Justo Sierra-Johnson; Yoel Korenfeld; Simona Boarin; Josef Korinek; Michael D Jensen; Gianfranco Parati; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  The obese without cardiometabolic risk factor clustering and the normal weight with cardiometabolic risk factor clustering: prevalence and correlates of 2 phenotypes among the US population (NHANES 1999-2004).

Authors:  Rachel P Wildman; Paul Muntner; Kristi Reynolds; Aileen P McGinn; Swapnil Rajpathak; Judith Wylie-Rosett; MaryFran R Sowers
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-11

Review 7.  Metabolic and body composition factors in subgroups of obesity: what do we know?

Authors:  Antony D Karelis; David H St-Pierre; Florence Conus; Remi Rabasa-Lhoret; Eric T Poehlman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Validity and reliability of self-reported physical activity status: the Lipid Research Clinics questionnaire.

Authors:  B E Ainsworth; D R Jacobs; A S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Central adiposity determines prevalence differences of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Carlos Lorenzo; Manuel Serrano-Ríos; María T Martínez-Larrad; Rafael Gabriel; Ken Williams; Juan A Gómez-Gerique; Michael P Stern; Steven M Haffner
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-12

10.  Impact of body mass index and the metabolic syndrome on the risk of cardiovascular disease and death in middle-aged men.

Authors:  Johan Arnlöv; Erik Ingelsson; Johan Sundström; Lars Lind
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  9 in total

1.  Natural course of metabolically healthy abdominal obese adults after 10 years of follow-up: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

Authors:  R Eshtiaghi; S Keihani; F Hosseinpanah; M Barzin; F Azizi
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  The dynamic behaviour of metabolic syndrome and its components in an eight-year population-based cohort from the Mediterranean.

Authors:  Maria A Barceló; Antonio Rodríguez-Poncelas; Marc Saez; Gabriel Coll-de-Tuero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Overweight and Obesity: Findings from 20 Years of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

Authors:  Maryam Barzin; Majid Valizadeh; Sara Serahati; Maryam Mahdavi; Fereidoun Azizi; Farhad Hosseinpanah
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 4.  Metabolic Syndrome: Findings from 20 Years of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

Authors:  Firoozeh Hosseini-Esfahani; Zahra Bahadoran; Nazanin Moslehi; Golaleh Asghari; Emad Yuzbashian; Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi; Parvin Mirmiran; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-10-21

5.  Metabolic Unhealthiness Increases the Likelihood of Having Metabolic Syndrome Components in Normoweight Young Adults.

Authors:  Bagas Suryo Bintoro; Yen-Chun Fan; Chia-Chi Chou; Kuo-Liong Chien; Chyi-Huey Bai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Impact of Metabolic Syndrome Components in High-Risk Cardiovascular Disease Development in Older Adults.

Authors:  Yuri Gustavo de Sousa Barbalho; Marina Morato Stival; Luciano Ramos de Lima; Izabel Cristina Rodrigues da Silva; Alessandro de Oliveira Silva; Manoela Vieira Gomes da Costa; Tania Cristina Morais Santa Barbara Rehem; Silvana Schwerz Funghetto
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Correlations between Coffee Consumption and Metabolic Phenotypes, Plasma Folate, and Vitamin B12: NHANES 2003 to 2006.

Authors:  Pratibha V Nerurkar; Krupa Gandhi; John J Chen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Longitudinal associations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with metabolic syndrome in the Chinese population: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiao-Rong Wang; Gui-Rong Song; Meng Li; Hong-Ge Sun; Yong-Jun Fan; Ying Liu; Qi-Gui Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Genetic markers and continuity of healthy metabolic status: Tehran cardio-metabolic genetic study (TCGS).

Authors:  Omid Gharooi Ahangar; Niloufar Javanrouh; Maryam S Daneshpour; Maryam Barzin; Majid Valizadeh; Fereidoun Azizi; Farhad Hosseinpanah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.