Literature DB >> 23963251

Simple and efficient technique for the preparation of testicular cell suspensions.

Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga1, Gustavo A Folle, Federico Santiñaque, Beatriz López-Carro, Adriana Geisinger.   

Abstract

Mammalian testes are very complex organs that contain over 30 different cell types, including somatic testicular cells and different stages of germline cells. This heterogeneity is an important drawback concerning the study of the bases of mammalian spermatogenesis, as pure or enriched cell populations in certain stages of sperm development are needed for most molecular analyses. Various strategies such as Staput, centrifugal elutriation, and flow cytometry (FC) have been employed to obtain enriched or purified testicular cell populations in order to enable differential gene expression studies. It is required that cells are in suspension for most enrichment/ purification approaches. Ideally, the cell suspension will be representative of the original tissue, have a high proportion of viable cells and few multinucleates--which tend to form because of the syncytial nature of the seminiferous epithelium--and lack cell clumps . Previous reports had evidenced that testicular cell suspensions prepared by an exclusively mechanical method clumped more easily than trypsinized ones. On the other hand, enzymatic treatments with RNAses and/or disaggregating enzymes like trypsin and collagenase lead to specific macromolecules degradation, which is undesirable for certain downstream applications. The ideal process should be as short as possible and involve minimal manipulation, so as to achieve a good preservation of macromolecules of interest such as mRNAs. Current protocols for the preparation of cell suspensions from solid tissues are usually time-consuming, highly operator-dependent, and may selectively damage certain cell types . The protocol presented here combines the advantages of a highly reproducible and extremely brief mechanical disaggregation with the absence of enzymatic treatment, leading to good quality cell suspensions that can be used for flow cytometric analysis and sorting, and ulterior gene expression studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963251      PMCID: PMC3846780          DOI: 10.3791/50102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  12 in total

Review 1.  Flow cytometry for gene expression studies in Mammalian spermatogenesis.

Authors:  A Geisinger; R Rodríguez-Casuriaga
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity. A morphological characterization.

Authors:  L J Romrell; A R Bellvé; D W Fawcett
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Flow cytometry purification of mouse meiotic cells.

Authors:  Irina V Getun; Bivian Torres; Philippe R J Bois
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by velocity sedimentation.

Authors:  M L Meistrich
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Red but not dead? Membranes of stressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae are permeable to propidium iodide.

Authors:  H M Davey; P Hexley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  High-purity flow sorting of early meiocytes based on DNA analysis of guinea pig spermatogenic cells.

Authors:  Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Adriana Geisinger; Federico F Santiñaque; Beatriz López-Carro; Gustavo A Folle
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 7.  Flow cytometric analysis for reproductive biology.

Authors:  M Spanò; D P Evenson
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  The separation, physical characterization, and differentiation kinetics of spermatogonial cells of the mouse.

Authors:  D M Lam; R Furrer; W R Bruce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Developmental schedule of the postnatal rat testis determined by flow cytometry.

Authors:  M Malkov; Y Fisher; J Don
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Ultra-fast and optimized method for the preparation of rodent testicular cells for flow cytometric analysis.

Authors:  Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Adriana Geisinger; Beatriz López-Carro; Valentina Porro; Rodolfo Wettstein; Gustavo A Folle
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.244

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Ana C Lima; Min Jung; Jannette Rusch; Abul Usmani; Alexandra M Lopes; Donald F Conrad
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Testicular Toxicity of Chloroxylenol in Rats: Biochemical, Pathological and Flow Cytometric Study.

Authors:  Doaa Abdallah El-Naggar; Laila Mohammed Ahmad El-Zalabany; Doaa Abdelhalim Shahin; Afaf Mahmoud Attia; Shaaban Abdelfattah El-Mosallamy
Journal:  J Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-13

3.  Rapid preparation of rodent testicular cell suspensions and spermatogenic stages purification by flow cytometry using a novel blue-laser-excitable vital dye.

Authors:  Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Federico F Santiñaque; Gustavo A Folle; Elisa Souza; Beatriz López-Carro; Adriana Geisinger
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2014-10-16

4.  Multispecies Purification of Testicular Germ Cells.

Authors:  Ana C Lima; Min Jung; Jannette Rusch; Abul Usmani; Alexandra Lopes; Donald F Conrad
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  SPATS1 (spermatogenesis-associated, serine-rich 1) is not essential for spermatogenesis and fertility in mouse.

Authors:  Carlos A Capoano; Luis Adrián Ortiz-Laquintana; Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Geraldine Schlapp; María Noel Meikle; Ana Paula Mulet; Martina Crispo; Ricardo Benavente; Adriana Geisinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mesenchymal stem cells promote spermatogonial stem/progenitor cell pool and spermatogenesis in neonatal mice in vitro.

Authors:  Selin Önen; Sevil Köse; Nilgün Yersal; Petek Korkusuz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  NODAL secreted by male germ cells regulates the proliferation and function of human Sertoli cells from obstructive azoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia patients.

Authors:  Ru-Hui Tian; Shi Yang; Zi-Jue Zhu; Jun-Long Wang; Yun Liu; Chencheng Yao; Meng Ma; Ying Guo; Qingqing Yuan; Yanan Hai; Yi-Ran Huang; Zuping He; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Transcriptome analysis of highly purified mouse spermatogenic cell populations: gene expression signatures switch from meiotic-to postmeiotic-related processes at pachytene stage.

Authors:  Irene da Cruz; Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Federico F Santiñaque; Joaquina Farías; Gianni Curti; Carlos A Capoano; Gustavo A Folle; Ricardo Benavente; José Roberto Sotelo-Silveira; Adriana Geisinger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Revealing stage-specific expression patterns of long noncoding RNAs along mouse spermatogenesis.

Authors:  María F Trovero; Rosana Rodríguez-Casuriaga; Carlos Romeo; Federico F Santiñaque; Mateo François; Gustavo A Folle; Ricardo Benavente; José R Sotelo-Silveira; Adriana Geisinger
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.