UNLABELLED: [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]-octreotate (177Lu-octreotate) in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) offers direct intra-therapeutic dosimetry. The aim of this study was to compare tumour and non-tumour parameters and assess intra-individual variations. PATIENTS, METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 53 consecutive PRRT treatment cycles (mean activity of 7.53 ± 0.46 GBq 177Lu-octreotate, intended four cycles at intervals of 10-14 weeks, standard nephroprotection) in 27 GEP NET patients. Extended planar dosimetry with serial whole-body imaging on selected, non-superimposed tumour and non-tumour regions; liver (LM), bone (BM), and other (OM) metastases. The per-cycle variation was compared with post-treatment response (CT/MRI three months post-treatment, modified SWOG criteria). RESULTS: Residence time in tumor lesions (133-147 h) exceeded that in kidneys (93 h). Tumour-to-kidney absorbed dose ratios ranged from 14 to 28 (LM, BM, OM). Intra-individual per-cycle dose variation was insignificant for kidneys, but significant for metastases (LM, BM, and OM; p < 0.05). The mean per-cycle decrease of tumour absorbed dose (ΔD/A0[%]) was linked to morphologic response after PRRT. A mean decrease of >20% was predictive of a partial or minor remission in all 11 evaluable patients, while absent significant dose reduction indicated stable or progressive disease in 4/5 patients. The dose decrease was unrelated to volume effects and also observed for BM. CONCLUSION: Besides confirmation of a favourable tumour-to-kidney parameter relation for 177Lu-octreotate, stepwise intra-lesional comparison seems to imply a prognostic impact of tumor dosimetry: The early per-cycle change ΔD/A0 between treatment cycles may predict the outcome after PRRT. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.
UNLABELLED: [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]-octreotate (177Lu-octreotate) in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) offers direct intra-therapeutic dosimetry. The aim of this study was to compare tumour and non-tumour parameters and assess intra-individual variations. PATIENTS, METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 53 consecutive PRRT treatment cycles (mean activity of 7.53 ± 0.46 GBq177Lu-octreotate, intended four cycles at intervals of 10-14 weeks, standard nephroprotection) in 27 GEP NET patients. Extended planar dosimetry with serial whole-body imaging on selected, non-superimposed tumour and non-tumour regions; liver (LM), bone (BM), and other (OM) metastases. The per-cycle variation was compared with post-treatment response (CT/MRI three months post-treatment, modified SWOG criteria). RESULTS: Residence time in tumor lesions (133-147 h) exceeded that in kidneys (93 h). Tumour-to-kidney absorbed dose ratios ranged from 14 to 28 (LM, BM, OM). Intra-individual per-cycle dose variation was insignificant for kidneys, but significant for metastases (LM, BM, and OM; p < 0.05). The mean per-cycle decrease of tumour absorbed dose (ΔD/A0[%]) was linked to morphologic response after PRRT. A mean decrease of >20% was predictive of a partial or minor remission in all 11 evaluable patients, while absent significant dose reduction indicated stable or progressive disease in 4/5 patients. The dose decrease was unrelated to volume effects and also observed for BM. CONCLUSION: Besides confirmation of a favourable tumour-to-kidney parameter relation for 177Lu-octreotate, stepwise intra-lesional comparison seems to imply a prognostic impact of tumor dosimetry: The early per-cycle change ΔD/A0 between treatment cycles may predict the outcome after PRRT. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Authors: Sander M Bison; Mark W Konijnenberg; Marleen Melis; Stefan E Pool; Monique R Bernsen; Jaap J M Teunissen; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Marion de Jong Journal: Clin Transl Imaging Date: 2014-03-05
Authors: L Bodei; M Kidd; I M Modlin; S Severi; I Drozdov; S Nicolini; D J Kwekkeboom; E P Krenning; R P Baum; G Paganelli Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Thorsten Derlin; Rudolf A Werner; Alexander Weich; Takahiro Higuchi; Ralph A Bundschuh; Constantin Lapa; Sebastian E Serfling; Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper; Ken Herrmann; Andreas K Buck Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.484
Authors: Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Roberto Garcia-Figueiras; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Isabel Sevilla; Alex Teule; Maria Quindos; Enrique Grande; Jaume Capdevila; Javier Aller; Javier Arbizu; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Daphne Merel Valerie Huizing; Berlinda Jantina de Wit-van der Veen; Marcel Verheij; Marcellus Petrus Maria Stokkel Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 3.138