Literature DB >> 23962578

A survey of the attitudes and perceptions of multidisciplinary team members towards family presence at bedside rounds in the intensive care unit.

Cecilia Santiago1, Lorena Lazar, Depeng Jiang, Karen E A Burns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the attitudes and perceptions of intensive care unit (ICU) staff [critical care physicians and fellows (MDs), registered nurses (RNs), allied health discipline (HD) and managers] towards family presence at bedside rounds. RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY: We developed, tested and administered a questionnaire to the multidisciplinary staff.
SETTING: 24-Bed medical surgical ICU.
RESULTS: 160/221 (72.4%) individuals responded, including 12 MDs, 95 RNs, 48 HD personnel, 4 managers and 1 unspecified. While most MDs strongly agreed and HD and management groups somewhat agreed, most RNs strongly disagreed with providing family members the option to attend rounds. Over 50% of respondents either strongly or somewhat agreed that the presence of family members prolongs rounds, reduces the medical education provided to the team and constrains delivery of negative medical information. Compared to MDs, RNs expressed greater reservation to family presence at rounds. Among RNs, more experienced RNs, expressed greater reservation with family presence during rounds.
CONCLUSION: We found significant differences among the attitudes of health care providers towards family presence at bedside rounds with RNs, especially more experienced RNs, expressing the greatest reservation. Qualitative research is required to explore perceived and actual barriers to family member presence at rounds.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bedside rounds; Family presence

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23962578     DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs        ISSN: 0964-3397            Impact factor:   3.072


  4 in total

1.  Prospective Evaluation of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Outcomes in Intensive Care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study.

Authors:  Patricia C Dykes; Ronen Rozenblum; Anuj Dalal; Anthony Massaro; Frank Chang; Marsha Clements; Sarah Collins; Jacques Donze; Maureen Fagan; Priscilla Gazarian; John Hanna; Lisa Lehmann; Kathleen Leone; Stuart Lipsitz; Kelly McNally; Conny Morrison; Lipika Samal; Eli Mlaver; Kumiko Schnock; Diana Stade; Deborah Williams; Catherine Yoon; David W Bates
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.296

Review 2.  Patient and family involvement in adult critical and intensive care settings: a scoping review.

Authors:  Michelle Olding; Sarah E McMillan; Scott Reeves; Madeline H Schmitt; Kathleen Puntillo; Simon Kitto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  A Survey of Rounding Practices in Canadian Adult Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Marilynne A Hebert; David A Zygun; Romain Rigal; Simon Berthelot; Deborah J Cook; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Healthcare professional perceptions of family-centred rounds in French NICUs: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Véronique Thébaud; Marion Lecorguillé; Jean-Michel Roué; Jacques Sizun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.