Literature DB >> 23962242

MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer from a Nordic perspective.

Jacob Christian Lindegaard1, Lars Ulrik Fokdal, Søren Kynde Nielsen, Jens Juul-Christensen, Kari Tanderup.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The first Nordic protocol for three-dimensional (3D) planned radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer was the prospective NOCECA study (1994-2000). NOCECA consisted of computed tomography (CT)-based 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the primary tumour combined with brachytherapy (BT) based on x-ray imaging. In NOCECA the planning aim was to achieve 80 Gy at point A from EBRT and BT combined. However, the balance of dose between EBRT and BT was determined by tumour size at diagnosis with more EBRT dose given to point A and less by BT in more advanced stages. In 2005 image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optimisation of the BT dose distribution to the remaining tumour and cervix at time of BT (HR CTV) was introduced in Aarhus. EBRT remained like in NOCECA until 2008 when the SIB to the primary tumour was abandoned and IMRT was introduced as routine technique. In this study, we report outcome of our first five-year experience with IGABT using our NOCECA cohort as reference.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The NOCECA cohort comprising 99 patients was compared with 140 consecutive patients treated by IGABT. Patients with para-aortic nodes were excluded in NOCECA but were present in 9% of the patients treated with IGABT. No patient in NOCECA received chemotherapy whereas concomitant cisplatin was given to 79% of the IGABT patients.
RESULTS: With IGABT actuarial local control was 91% at three years. When comparing NOCECA with IGABT overall survival was significantly improved from 63% to 79% (p = 0.005). In parallel, both moderate and severe late morbidity were reduced by about 50% (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Introduction of IGABT reduced morbidity and generated a very high rate of local control, which likely has improved survival by at least as much as concomitant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23962242     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.818253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  69 in total

Review 1.  Radiobiological considerations in combining doses from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Tornero-López; Damián Guirado
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-02

2.  Brachytherapy: where has it gone?

Authors:  Daniel G Petereit; Steven J Frank; Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; Patricia Eifel; Paul L Nguyen; David E Wazer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Late side effects of 3T MRI-guided 3D high-dose rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer : Institutional experiences.

Authors:  Radovan Vojtíšek; Emília Sukovská; Jan Baxa; Marie Budíková; Petra Kovářová; Jindřich Fínek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-23

5.  Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the parametrium and cervix in radiotherapy for uterine cervical carcinoma: a dosimetric study using a new alternative approach.

Authors:  Jen-Yu Cheng; Eng-Yen Huang; Shun-Neng Hsu; Chong-Jong Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer : Prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  Yeon-Joo Kim; Joo-Young Kim; Youngkyong Kim; Young Kyung Lim; Jonghwi Jeong; Chiyoung Jeong; Meyoung Kim; Myong Cheol Lim; Sang-Soo Seo; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Recent developments and best practice in brachytherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  C D Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Analytical modeling and feasibility study of a multi-GPU cloud-based server (MGCS) framework for non-voxel-based dose calculations.

Authors:  J Neylon; Y Min; P Kupelian; D A Low; A Santhanam
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Impact of primary para-aortic lymphadenectomy on distant failure in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated in the era of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Authors:  Cyrus Chargari; Renaud Mazeron; Ariane Dunant; Sébastien Gouy; Claire Petit; Pierre Maroun; Catherine Uzan; Pierre Annede; Enrica Bentivegna; Corinne Balleyguier; Catherine Genestie; Patricia Pautier; Alexandra Leary; Catherine Lhomme; Eric Deutsch; Philippe Morice; Christine Haie-Meder
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance image guided brachytherapy.

Authors:  Kari Tanderup; Akila N Viswanathan; Christian Kirisits; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.