| Literature DB >> 23962225 |
Andrie G Panayiotou1, Maura Griffin2, Panayiotis Kouis3, Theodosis Tyllis4, Niki Georgiou4, Dawn Bond2, Andrew N Nicolaides5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the association between presence and number of components of the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and subclinical atherosclerosis outcomes (common carotid intima media thickness, plaque presence and sum of plaque area) in both the carotid and femoral bifurcations.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerotic plaques; Carotid; Femoral; IMT; Metabolic syndrome; Metabolic syndrome components; Plaque area
Year: 2013 PMID: 23962225 PMCID: PMC3765162 DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-5-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Baseline characteristics of the study population (n = 771) for men and women separately
| 61.02 (0.56) | 60.06 (0.48) | 0.19 | |
| 136.47 (0.88) | 140.96 (0.86) | <0.001 | |
| 27.8 (0.22) | 28.3(0.25) | 0.14 | |
| 5.67 (0.06) | 6.0 (0.06) | <0.001 | |
| 3.47 (0.04) | 3.56 (0.037) | 0.10 | |
| 1.16 (0.015) | 1.41 (0.015) | <0.001 | |
| 1.55 (1.15; 2.15) | 1.40 (1.04; 1.95) | 0.002 | |
| 1.35 (0.011) | 1.53 (0.012) | <0.001 | |
| 1.20 (0.013) | 1.19 (0.012) | 0.47 | |
| 38.0% | 37.0% | 0.77 | |
| 21.5% | 16.6% | 0.08 | |
| 17.3% | 9.5% | 0.001 | |
| | | | |
| | 5.3% | 12.9% | <0.001 |
| | 19.6% | 35.0% | <0.001 |
| | 29.1% | 28.4% | 0.38 |
| | 25.4% | 18.2% | 0.21 |
| | 17.0% | 4.4% | <0.001 |
| | 3.6% | 1.2% | 0.059 |
*Mean and standard deviation (sd) is used for normally distributed values.
†Median and interquartile range (iqr) is used for non-normally distributed values.
Baseline characteristics of the study population by sex, according to presence of the Metabolic syndrome
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||||
| 61.86 (±0.83) | 60.32 (±0.77) | 0.17 | 64.96 (±0.88) | 58.52 (±0.55) | <0.001 | |
| 141.34 (±1.27) | 132.26 (±1.15) | <0.001 | 151.82 (±1.16) | 137.49 (±0.96) | <0.001 | |
| 85.69 (±0.77) | 80.79 (±0.73) | <0.001 | 89.27 (±0.92) | 82.67 (±0.51) | <0.001 | |
| 50.9% | 28.4% | <0.001 | 60.4% | 29.4% | <0.001 | |
| 5.61 (±0.08) | 5.70 (±0.08) | 0.56 | 6.04 (±0.1) | 5.99 (±0.06) | 0.67 | |
| 3.44 (±0.06) | 3.49 (±0.06) | 0.52 | 3.58 (± 0.06) | 3.54 (± 0.04) | 0.66 | |
| 1.03 (±0.63) | 1.27 (±0.02) | <0.001 | 1.20 (± 0.02) | 1.48 (±0.016) | <0.001 | |
| 2.10 (1.63; 2.64) | 1.32 (0.98; 1.57) | <0.001 | 2.15 (1.78; 2.83) | 1.24 (0.97; 1.56) | <0.001 | |
| 30.7% | 6.3% | <0.001 | 33.3% | 2.3% | <0.001 | |
| 29.88 (±0.35) | 26.06 (±0.2) | <0.001 | 32.39 (±0.47) | 26.95 (±0.25) | <0.001 | |
| 1.29 (±0.013) | 1.40 (±0.017) | <0.001 | 1.44 (±0.02) | 1.55 (±0.001) | <0.001 | |
| 1.21 (±0.02) | 1.19 (±0.02) | 0.48 | 1.23 (±0.02) | 1.18 (±0.014) | 0.044 | |
| 2.25(1.15; 4.18) | 0.94(0.51; 1.8) | <0.001 | 2.51 (1.67; 3.86) | 1.14 (0.72; 1.7) | <0.001 | |
| 0.79 (±0.15) | 0.76 (±0.12) | 0.084 | 0.77 (±0.16) | 0.69 (±0.13) | <0.001 | |
| 53 (25; 103) | 42 (10;72) | 0.002 | 16 (1; 44) | 8 (1;32) | 0.01 | |
| 22 (1; 39) | 12 (1; 27.5) | 0.011 | 8.75 (1;25.75) | 1 (1; 19) | 0.013 | |
| 33(10; 62) | 23(1; 49) | 0.011 | 1(1; 17.75) | 1(1; 6) | 0.012 | |
*Mean and standard deviation (sd) is used for normally distributed values.
†Median and interquartile range (iqr) is used for non-normally distributed values.
Figure 1Association between the number of MetS components and IMTcc.
Associations between (i) metabolic syndrome presence and (ii) number of components (exposures) and atherosclerosis outcomes
| | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||||||||||
| IMTcc (mm) | 0.03 (0.00 to 0.05) | 0.02 | 0.278 | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) | <0.001 | 0.286 | 0.02 (0.00 to 0.04) | 0.047 | 0.287 | 0.02 (0.01 to 0.02) | <0.001 | 0.296 |
| (ln)SPA | 0.24 (0.002 to 0.47) | 0.048 | 0.330 | 0.17 (0.07 to 0.26) | <0.001 | 0.337 | 0.22 (−0.015 to 0.45) | 0.07 | 0.344 | 0.16 (0.07 to 0.25) | 0.001 | 0.351 |
| (ln)SPAcar | 0.15 (−0.07 to 0.38) | 0.18 | 0.234 | 0.10 (0.01 to 0.19) | 0.03 | 0.237 | 0.16 (−0.07 to 0.38) | 0.17 | 0.241 | 0.10 (0.01 to 0.19) | 0.03 | 0.244 |
| (ln)SPAfem | 0.26 (0.02 to 0.50) | 0.03 | 0.303 | 0.15 (0.05 to 0.24) | 0.003 | 0.307 | 0.24 (0.004 to 0.48) | 0.046 | 0.333 | 0.14 (0.05 to 0.24) | 0.003 | 0.337 |
| | ||||||||||||
| Plaque Presence (0 Vs 1–4) | 1.42 (0.93 to 2.16) | 0.10 | 0.303 | 1.27 (1.08 to 1.5) | <0.001 | 0.319 | 1.38 (0.91 to 2.12) | 0.13 | 0.312 | 1.25 (1.06 to 1.48) | 0.008 | 0.326 |
*Basic model: adjusted for age and sex.
†Adjusted model: adjusted for age, sex, family history of CVD, alcohol consumption (BU/week) and smoking (pack-years).
# P for trend.
For ln-transformed outcomes of TPA, the B coefficient gives the% change per unit change in the independent.
R2: adjusted R2 for linear regression and Nagelkerke pseudo-R2 for logistic regression models.
P value for model fit (F statistic) <0.001 for all models.
Figure 2Association between the number of MetS components and sum of plaque area (SPA).