BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adenosine may be generated by hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides by ectonucleotidases, including ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (CD39), ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73), nucleotide pyrophosphatase phosphodiesterase 1 (NPP-1) and tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP). Previous work from our laboratory has uncovered a critical role for adenosine A1 receptors (A1 R) in osteoclastogenesis; blockade or deletion of these receptors diminishes osteoclast differentiation. Interestingly, selective A1 R agonists neither affect basal osteoclastogenesis nor do they reverse A1 R antagonist-mediated inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. In this study, we determined whether ectonucleotidase-mediated adenosine production was required for A1 R antagonist-mediated inhibition, and, when we saw no effect, determined whether A1 R was constitutively activated and the antagonist was acting as an inverse agonist to diminish osteoclast differentiation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Osteoclast formation derived from wild-type, CD39 knockout (KO), CD73 KO, NPP-1 KO and TNAP KO mice was examined by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated osteoclasts and osteoclast gene expression (Ctsk, Acp5, MMP-9 and NFATc1). Intracellular cAMP concentration was determined by elisa. KEY RESULTS: Rolofylline inhibited osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 = 20-70 nM) in mice lacking all four of these phosphatases, although baseline osteoclast formation was significantly less in precursors from CD73 KO mice. Rolofylline (1 μM) stimulates cAMP production in bone marrow macrophages by 10.23 ± 0.89-fold. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Based on these findings, we hypothesize that the A1 R is constitutively activated in osteoclast precursors, thereby diminishing basal AC activity, and that A1 R antagonists act as inverse agonists to release A1 R-mediated inhibition of basal AC activity and permit osteoclast differentiation. The constitutive activity of A1 R promotes osteoclast formation and down-regulation of this activity blocks osteoclast formation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adenosine may be generated by hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides by ectonucleotidases, including ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (CD39), ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73), nucleotide pyrophosphatase phosphodiesterase 1 (NPP-1) and tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP). Previous work from our laboratory has uncovered a critical role for adenosine A1 receptors (A1 R) in osteoclastogenesis; blockade or deletion of these receptors diminishes osteoclast differentiation. Interestingly, selective A1 R agonists neither affect basal osteoclastogenesis nor do they reverse A1 R antagonist-mediated inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. In this study, we determined whether ectonucleotidase-mediated adenosine production was required for A1 R antagonist-mediated inhibition, and, when we saw no effect, determined whether A1 R was constitutively activated and the antagonist was acting as an inverse agonist to diminish osteoclast differentiation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Osteoclast formation derived from wild-type, CD39 knockout (KO), CD73 KO, NPP-1 KO and TNAP KO mice was examined by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining of receptor activator of NF-κB ligand-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated osteoclasts and osteoclast gene expression (Ctsk, Acp5, MMP-9 and NFATc1). Intracellular cAMP concentration was determined by elisa. KEY RESULTS: Rolofylline inhibited osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 = 20-70 nM) in mice lacking all four of these phosphatases, although baseline osteoclast formation was significantly less in precursors from CD73 KO mice. Rolofylline (1 μM) stimulates cAMP production in bone marrow macrophages by 10.23 ± 0.89-fold. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Based on these findings, we hypothesize that the A1 R is constitutively activated in osteoclast precursors, thereby diminishing basal AC activity, and that A1 R antagonists act as inverse agonists to release A1 R-mediated inhibition of basal AC activity and permit osteoclast differentiation. The constitutive activity of A1 R promotes osteoclast formation and down-regulation of this activity blocks osteoclast formation.
Authors: Firas M Kara; Stephen B Doty; Adele Boskey; Steven Goldring; Mone Zaidi; Bertil B Fredholm; Bruce N Cronstein Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-02
Authors: Maryse Picher; Lauranell H Burch; Andrew J Hirsh; Josef Spychala; Richard C Boucher Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-01-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A Gartland; K A Buckley; R A Hipskind; M J Perry; J H Tobias; G Buell; I Chessell; W B Bowler; J A Gallagher Journal: Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr Date: 2003 Impact factor: 1.807
Authors: Karen M Dwyer; Silvia Deaglio; Wenda Gao; David Friedman; Terry B Strom; Simon C Robson Journal: Purinergic Signal Date: 2007-02-06 Impact factor: 3.765
Authors: Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Vivian Bradaschia-Correa; Anne M Josephson; Alexander J Egol; Matthew M Mizrahi; Kevin Leclerc; Jason Huo; Bruce N Cronstein; Philipp Leucht Journal: Tissue Cell Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 2.466
Authors: Min Lu; Bo Wang; Cheng Zhang; Xiaomei Zhuang; Mei Yuan; Haoshan Wang; Weizhang Li; Ruibin Su; Jin Li Journal: Purinergic Signal Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 3.765
Authors: Bruno Bragança; Nádia Oliveira-Monteiro; Fátima Ferreirinha; Pedro A Lima; Miguel Faria; Ana P Fontes-Sousa; Paulo Correia-de-Sá Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.810