Literature DB >> 23962020

Meta-analysis methods for risk differences.

Douglas G Bonett1, Robert M Price.   

Abstract

The difference between two proportions, referred to as a risk difference, is a useful measure of effect size in studies where the response variable is dichotomous. Confidence interval methods based on a varying coefficient model are proposed for combining and comparing risk differences from multi-study between-subjects or within-subjects designs. The proposed methods are new alternatives to the popular constant coefficient and random coefficient methods. The proposed varying coefficient methods do not require the constant coefficient assumption of effect size homogeneity, nor do they require the random coefficient assumption that the risk differences from the selected studies represent a random sample from a normally distributed superpopulation of risk differences. The proposed varying coefficient methods are shown to have excellent finite-sample performance characteristics under realistic conditions.
© 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23962020     DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  2 in total

1.  Primary Prevention of Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Preventive Lymphatic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Ciudad; Joseph M Escandón; Valeria P Bustos; Oscar J Manrique; Juste Kaciulyte
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

2.  Estimation of Effect Heterogeneity in Rare Events Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Heinz Holling; Katrin Jansen; Walailuck Böhning; Dankmar Böhning; Susan Martin; Patarawan Sangnawakij
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.