Literature DB >> 23961310

High-quality-draft genome sequence of the yellow-pigmented flavobacterium Joostella marina type strain (En5(T)).

Erko Stackebrandt1, Olga Chertkov, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Cliff Han, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne A Goodwin, David Bruce, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Natalia Mikhailova, Marcel Huntemann, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Manfred Rohde, Brian J Tindall, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, John C Detter, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

At present, Joostella marina Quan et al. 2008 is the sole species with a validly published name in the genus Joostella, family Flavobacteriacae, phylum Bacteriodetes. It is a yellow-pigmented, aerobic, marine organism about which little has been reported other than the chemotaxonomic features required for initial taxonomic description. The genome of J. marina strain En5(T) complements a list of 16 Flavobacteriaceae strains for which complete genomes and draft genomes are currently available. Here we describe the features of this bacterium, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first member of the genus Joostella for which a complete genome sequence becomes available. The 4,508,243 bp long single replicon genome with its 3,944 protein-coding and 60 RNA genes is part of the G enomic E ncyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriaceae; GEBA; Gram-negative; aerobic; mesophile; non-motile

Year:  2013        PMID: 23961310      PMCID: PMC3739173          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3537045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain En5T (= DSM 19592 = KCTC 12518 = CGMCC 1.6973) is the type strain of [1], which is the type species of the monospecific genus that was named after P.J. Jooste, who first proposed the family [1]. A second species name, ‘’ [2] has been effectively published but not yet appeared on a validation list. was isolated by dilution-plating on marine agar 2216 (Difco) from coastal seawater in the East Sea of Korea. The phylogenetically neighboring genera are [3] and [4]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for En5T together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation. The genome of strain En5T complements a list of 16 [5,6] strains for which complete genomes and draft genomes are already available.

Classification and features

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis

A representative genomic 16S rRNA gene sequence of En5T was compared using NCBI BLAST [7,8] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [9] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [10]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genera were (15.8%), (14.2%), (10.7%), (6.9%) and (6.1%) (123 hits in total). Regarding the single hit to sequences from members of , the average identity within HSPs was 100.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 99.0%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was 'Venteria marina' (DQ097522), which corresponded to an identity of 100.0% and an HSP coverage of 99.0%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.). The record for DQ097522 was, however, subsequently removed from Genbank at the submitter's request, because the source organism could not be confirmed. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was DQ490025 (Greengenes short name 'Microbial life ridge flank crustal fluids clone ODP-33B-02'), which showed an identity of 99.7% and an HSP coverage of 100.0%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'marin' (5.2%), 'water' (3.7%), 'microbi' (3.1%), 'sea' (2.9%) and 'north' (2.0%) (127 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rDNA sequence (EF660761).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the type species of the other genera within the family . The tree was inferred from 1,370 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [13]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [14] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 600 ML bootstrap replicates [15] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [16] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks (see CP003283 for and [18-23]).

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of relative to the type strains of the type species of the other genera within the family . The tree was inferred from 1,370 aligned characters [11,12] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [13]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [14] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 600 ML bootstrap replicates [15] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [16] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [17] are labeled with one asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks (see CP003283 for and [18-23]).
Table 1

Classification and general features of En5T according to the MIGS recommendations [24].

MIGS ID   Property    Term   Evidence code
   Current classification    Domain Bacteria   TAS [25]
    Phylum Bacteroidetes   TAS [26,27]
    Class Flavobacteriia   TAS [28-30]
    Order Flavobacteriales   TAS [27,31]
    Family Flavobacteriaceae   TAS [5,6,32,33]
    Genus Joostella   TAS [1]
MIGS-7    Species Joostella marina   TAS [1]
MIGS-12   Subspecific genetic lineage (strain)    En5T   TAS [1]
   Reference for biomaterial    Quan et al. 2008   TAS [1]
   Gram stain    negative   TAS [1]
   Cell shape    rod-shaped   TAS [1]
   Motility    non-motile   TAS [1]
   Sporulation    non-sporulating   TAS [1]
   Temperature range    10-37°C   TAS [1]
   Optimum temperature    30°C   TAS [1]
MIGS-22   Salinity    0-15% NaCl, optimally 1-3% NaCl   TAS [1]
   Relationship to oxygen    obligate aerobe   TAS [1]
   Carbon source    monosaccarides   TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Energy metabolism    not reported
MIGS-6.2   Habitat    mud   TAS [1]
MIGS-15   pH    optimum 5.3 - 7.6   TAS [1]
MIGS-14   Biotic relationship    free living   TAS [1]
MIGS-16   Known pathogenicity    not reported
MIGS-18   Specific host    none   NAS
   Health status of host    not reported
MIGS-19   Biosafety level    1   TAS [34]
MIGS-23.1   Trophic level    not reported
MIGS-4   Isolation    coastal seawater   TAS [1]
MIGS-5   Geographic location    East Sea of Korea   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1   Time of sample collection    May 2007   NAS
MIGS-4.2   Latitude    not reported
MIGS-4.3   Longitude    not reported
MIGS-4.4   Depth    100 m   TAS [1]
   Altitude    - 100 m   TAS [1]

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [35].

Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). Evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [35].

Morphology and physiology

The rod-shaped cells of strain En5T (0.2-0.3 µm wide and 1.0-2.0 µm long) stain Gram-negative [1] (Figure 2). Flexirubin-type pigments are not formed and gliding motility is absent. The optimal NaCl concentration for growth is 1-3% but cells can grow in up to 15% NaCl. Optimal growth temperature is 30°C and no growth is observed at 4°C or at 42°C. Growth occurs at pH 5.3-10.5 with an optimum between pH 5.3 and 7.6. The organism is oxidase- and catalase-positive and strictly aerobic. Nitrate and nitrite are not reduced. Starch, aesculin and Tween 80 are hydrolyzed, but agar, casein and gelatin are not hydrolyzed. Glucose, sucrose, arabinose, mannose and maltose are utilized as sole carbon source while mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, gluconate, caprate, adipate, malate, citrate and phenylacetate are not utilized. Acid is produced from cellobiose, but not from glucose. Cells are positive for α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase, α-mannosidase, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and negative for the other enzyme activities tested by the API ZYM (bioMérieux) panel [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of En5T

Scanning electron micrograph of En5T

Chemotaxonomy

Major fatty acids (>10% of total) are branched-chain acids iso-C15:0, iso-C17:0 3-OH and iso-C17:1 9 and an unidentified fatty acid (ECL 13.566); minor amounts (>5%-<10%) are iso-C15:1 and summed feature 3 comprising C16:1 7 and/or iso-C15:0 2-OH. It should be noted that the original paper indicates that the fatty acid composition was determined using the MIDI system and in the peak naming tables iso-C15:1 is usually not listed without the addition of further information (e.g. iso-C15:1 F, iso-C15:1 G, iso-C15:1 H, with the capital letters indicating different isomers where the location of the double bond is not determined). Herzog et al. [36], have indicated that the fatty acid listed as iso-C17:1 9 may be incorrectly annotated in the MIDI system. Furthermore the resolution of summed feature 3 into C16:1 7 and/or iso-C15:0 2-OH is also significant in understanding the membrane structure/function as well as the evolution of the underlying biochemical pathways, since the synthesis of 2-OH fatty acids requires a specific enzyme, whereas the synthesis of unsaturated fatty acids (with different positions of unsaturation) also requires a specific set of enzymes. MK-6 is the major respiratory quinone. The DNA G+C content was initially reported with 30.1 mol% [1], much lower than the 33.6% inferred from the genome sequence (see in third table). No information is available for the peptidoglycan composition as this feature is not listed as a minimal standard for the descriptions of novel species [33]. No data is available on the polar lipid composition.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [37], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of and project [38]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [17] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using state of the art sequencing technology [39]. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID  Property    Term
MIGS-31  Finishing quality    Improved high quality draft
MIGS-28  Libraries used    Two genomic libraries: one 454 PE library (8 kb insert size),     one Illumina library
MIGS-29  Sequencing platforms    Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2  Sequencing coverage    1,149.8 × Illumina; 8.6 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30  Assemblers    Newbler version 2.3-PreRelease-6/30/2009,     Velvet 1.0.13, phrap version 1.080812
MIGS-32  Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
  INSDC ID    AJUG00000000
  GenBank Date of Release    May 4, 2012
  GOLD ID    Gi05349
  NCBI project ID    65069
  Database: IMG    2509276026
MIGS-13  Source material identifier    DSM 19592
  Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain En5T, DSM 19592, was grown in DSMZ medium 514 (Bacto Marine Broth, DIFCO 2216) [40] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer with modification but with additional 10 µl proteinase K digestion for cell lysis (40 min incubation at 58°C). DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [41].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [42]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly, consisting of 240 contigs in 6 scaffolds, was converted into a phrap [43] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (5,373.5 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [44] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 76.9 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 21. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [43] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [42], Dupfinisher [45], or by sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 193 additional reactions and one shatter library were necessary to close some gaps and to raise the quality of the final contigs. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [46]. The error rate of the final genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 1,158.4 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 219,876 pyrosequence and 68,081,556 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [47] as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [48], followed by a round of manual curation using the GenePRIMP pipeline [49]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [50].

Genome properties

The genome statistics are provided in Table 3 and Figure 3. The improved-high-quality-draft genome consists of two scaffolds with a length of 3,959,031 bp and 558,212 bp, respectively, and a G+C content of 33.6%. Of the 4,004 genes predicted, 3,944 were protein-coding genes, and 60 RNAs; 86 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (69.4%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value    % of Total
Genome size (bp)   4,508,243    100.00
DNA coding region (bp)   3,886,653    86.21
DNA G+C content (bp)   1,514,507    33.59
Number of scaffolds   2
Extrachromosomal elements   unknown
Total genes   4,004    100.00
RNA genes   60    1.50
rDNA operons   3
tRNA genes   45    1.12
Protein-coding genes   3,944    98.50
Pseudo genes   86    2.15
Genes with function prediction   2,777    69.36
Genes in paralog clusters   2,029    50.67
Genes assigned to COGs   2,678    66.88
Genes assigned Pfam domains   3,099    77.40
Genes with signal peptides   1,055    26.35
Genes with transmembrane helices   940    23.48
CRISPR repeats   1
Figure 3

Graphical maps of the largest, 3.96 Mbp long, scaffold. From bottom to top: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew (purple/olive).

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code  Value   % age    Description
J  153   5.29    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A  0   0.00    RNA processing and modification
K  203   7.01    Transcription
L  225   7.77    Replication, recombination and repair
B  0   0.00    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D  23   0.79    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y  0   0.00    Nuclear structure
V  50   1.73    Defense mechanisms
T  123   4.25    Signal transduction mechanisms
M  222   7.67    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N  6   0.21    Cell motility
Z  0   0.00    Cytoskeleton
W  0   0.00    Extracellular structures
U  62   2.14    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O  119   4.11    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C  133   4.60    Energy production and conversion
G  189   6.53    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E  211   7.29    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F  64   2.21    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H  144   4.98    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I  97   3.35    Lipid transport and metabolism
P  206   7.12    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q  50   1.73    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R  346   11.96    General function prediction only
S  268   9.26    Function unknown
-  1326   33.12    Not in COGs
Graphical maps of the largest, 3.96 Mbp long, scaffold. From bottom to top: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew (purple/olive).
  32 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Bernardet; Yasuyoshi Nakagawa; Barry Holmes
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales and Verrucomicrobiales are the genera Acholeplasma, Halanaerobium, Halobacterium, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanomicrobium, Planctomyces, Prochloron, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus, Thermoproteus and Verrucomicrobium, respectively. Opinion 79.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Complete genome sequence of Cellulophaga lytica type strain (LIM-21).

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Birte Abt; Hazuki Teshima; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Galina Ovchinikova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Cynthia D Jeffries; John C Detter; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; K Palani Kannan; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Natalia Ivanova
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-04-29

10.  Complete genome sequence of Riemerella anatipestifer type strain (ATCC 11845).

Authors:  Konstantinos Mavromatis; Megan Lu; Monica Misra; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxane Tapia; Cliff Han; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Cynthia D Jeffries; John C Detter; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Sabine Gronow; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2011-04-29
View more
  3 in total

1.  Biosurfactant activity, heavy metal tolerance and characterization of Joostella strain A8 from the Mediterranean polychaete Megalomma claparedei (Gravier, 1906).

Authors:  Carmen Rizzo; Luigi Michaud; Marco Graziano; Emilio De Domenico; Christoph Syldatk; Rudolf Hausmann; Angelina Lo Giudice
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Marina García-López; Supratim Mukherjee; Marcel Huntemann; Natalia N Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Halotolerant microbial consortia able to degrade highly recalcitrant plant biomass substrate.

Authors:  Larisa Cortes-Tolalpa; Justin Norder; Jan Dirk van Elsas; Joana Falcao Salles
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.813

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.