| Literature DB >> 23961094 |
Faisal Mohamed Abou-Tarboush1, Mohamed Fathy Abdel-Samad.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to investigate the cytogenetic effects of sildenafil citrate in SWR/J mouse bone marrow cells. Thirty-six males and 36 females were used and divided into four groups. Each group contained 18 animals (9 males and 9 females), weighing 30-35 g. These animals were orally administered with a single dose of 13, 26 or 40 mg/kg sildenafil citrate solution. A control group received normal saline in an identical condition. The animals were sacrificed at 12, 24 or 48 h, after the treatment. Chromosome aberrations were investigated in 50 metaphases per animal. No significant differences in the percentages of mitotic indices or in the frequencies of chromosome aberrations were observed between treated male and female mice at any doses or at any time intervals used, therefore, data from the two sexes were pooled when analyzed statistically. No significant (p < 0.05) differences in the percentages of mitotic indices or in the frequencies of chromosome aberrations were observed between sildenafil citrate-treated groups and the control group at any doses or at any time intervals used. However, the percentages of centromeric adhesions increased significantly (p < 0.01) in treated groups as compared with the control group at all doses and at all time intervals used. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that sildenafil citrate does not have cytogenetic effects on mouse bone marrow cells, but the centromeric adhesions induced by this drug need further studies to confirm them and to investigate the possible mechanism(s) responsible for such effect.Entities:
Keywords: Bone marrow cells; Chromosome aberration; Cytogenetic effect; Mice; Mitotic index; Sildenafil citrate; Viagra
Year: 2010 PMID: 23961094 PMCID: PMC3730803 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Effect of various doses of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on the mitotic index (MI) in bone marrow cells of SWR/J mice after 12 h of treatment.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of females used | No. of cells examined | No. of dividing cells | Mitotic index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | 6000 | 244 | 4.07 |
| 13 | 6 | 6000 | 233 | 3.88 |
| 26 | 6 | 6000 | 240 | 4.00 |
| 40 | 6 | 6000 | 232 | 3.87 |
Effect of various doses of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on the mitotic index (MI) in bone marrow cells of SWR/J mice after 24 h of treatment.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of females used | No. of cells examined | No. of dividing cells | Mitotic index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | 6000 | 253 | 4.22 |
| 13 | 6 | 6000 | 259 | 4.32 |
| 26 | 6 | 6000 | 251 | 4.18 |
| 40 | 6 | 6000 | 241 | 4.02 |
Effect of various doses of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on the mitotic index (MI) in bone marrow cells of SWR/J mice after 48 h of treatment.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of females used | No. of cells examined | No. of dividing cells | Mitotic index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6 | 6000 | 258 | 4.30 |
| 13 | 6 | 6000 | 238 | 3.97 |
| 26 | 6 | 6000 | 242 | 4.03 |
| 40 | 6 | 6000 | 244 | 4.07 |
Effect of various doses of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on the chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of SWR/J mice after 12 h of treatment.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of animals used | No. of cells examined | No. and types of numerical chromosomal aberrations | No. and types of structural chromosomal aberrations | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoploidy (2n−) | Hyperploidy (2n+) | Total | B | CA | Cad | G | F | Total | ||||||||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
| Control | 6 | 300 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.7 | – | – | 1 | 0.3 | 5 | 1.7 |
| 13 | 6 | 300 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 3 | 1.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 11 | 3.7 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 19 | 6.3 |
| 26 | 6 | 300 | – | – | 6 | 2.0 | 6 | 2.0 | – | – | 3 | 1.0 | 14 | 4.7 | – | – | 1 | 0.3 | 18 | 6.0 |
| 40 | 6 | 300 | 3 | 1.0 | 6 | 2.0 | 9 | 3.0 | 3 | 1.0 | 2 | 0.7 | 17 | 5.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.7 | 25 | 8.3 |
B = break, CA = centromeric attenuation Cad = centromeric adhesion, G = gap, F = fragment.
Differences are statistically significant from the control group at p < 0.05.
Differences are statistically significant from the control group at p < 0.01.
Effect of various doses of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on the chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of SWR/J mice after 24 h of treatment.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of animals used | No. of cells examined | No. and types of numerical chromosomal aberrations | No. and types of structural chromosomal aberrations | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoploidy (2 | Hyperploidy (2 | Total | B | CA | Cad | G | F | Total | ||||||||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
| Control | 6 | 300 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.7 | – | – | 1 | 0.3 | 5 | 1.7 |
| 13 | 6 | 300 | – | – | 5 | 1.7 | 5 | 1.7 | – | – | 3 | 1.0 | 14 | 4.7 | – | – | 1 | 0.3 | 18 | 6.0 |
| 26 | 6 | 300 | 3 | 1.0 | 1 | 0.3 | 4 | 1.3 | – | – | 4 | 1.3 | 18 | 6.0 | – | – | – | – | 22 | 7.3 |
| 40 | 6 | 300 | 2 | 0.7 | 3 | 1.0 | 5 | 1.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 5 | 1.7 | 22 | 7.3 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 31 | 10.3 |
B = break, CA = centromeric attenuation, Cad = centromeric adhesion G = gap F = fragment.
Differences are statistically significant from the control group at p < 0.01.
Effect of various doses of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on the chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of SWR/J mice after 48 h of treatment.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of animals used | No. of cells examined | No. and types of numerical chromosomal aberrations | No. and types of structural chromosomal aberrations | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoploidy (2 | Hyperploidy (2 | Total | B | CA | Cad | G | F | Total | ||||||||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |||
| Control | 6 | 300 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.7 | – | – | 1 | 0.3 | 5 | 1.7 |
| 13 | 6 | 300 | 2 | 0.7 | 5 | 1.7 | 7 | 2.3 | – | – | 6 | 2.0 | 14 | 4.7 | – | – | 1 | 0.3 | 21 | 7.0 |
| 26 | 6 | 300 | – | – | 4 | 1.3 | 4 | 1.3 | 2 | 0.7 | 8 | 2.7 | 20 | 6.7 | – | – | 2 | 0.7 | 32 | 10.7 |
| 40 | 6 | 300 | – | – | 5 | 1.7 | 5 | 1.7 | 4 | 1.3 | 3 | 1.0 | 24 | 8.0 | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 35 | 11.7 |
B = break, CA = centromeric attenuation, Cad = centromeric adhesion G = gap F = Fragment.
Differences are statistically significant from the control group at p < 0.01.
Figure 1Photomicrograph of mouse bone marrow cells at normal metaphase stage, (2). In metaphase images, (1), (3) and (4) arrows showing the centromeric adhesions (Cad), observed in sildenafil-treated animals.