Literature DB >> 2396082

The predictive value of history in dyspepsia.

T Johannessen1, H Petersen, P M Kleveland, J H Dybdahl, A K Sandvik, E Brenna, H Waldum.   

Abstract

Symptomatic patients referred to an open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopy completed a detailed, self-administered questionnaire aimed at assessing the predictive value of history in dyspepsia. Nine hundred and thirty patients were suitable for analysis. Of these, 29% were found to have organic dyspepsia. A substantial overlap of symptoms and demographic data was found among the various endoscopic diagnoses. Discriminating variables were identified by stepwise logistic regression analysis and included in predictive score models. Pain relieved by antacids, age above 40 years, previous peptic ulcer disease, male sex, symptoms provoked by berries, and night pain relieved by antacids and food were found to predict organic dyspepsia with a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 70%, when applied on the observed material. Similar probabilities were found for score models of peptic ulcer and esophagitis. In general, the low prevalence of organic diseases resulted in low positive and high negative predictive values. Accordingly, the main impact of the predictive models may be to reduce the number of negative endoscopies rather than to predict a precise diagnosis. Independent of disease category and age, 41% of the subjects expressed a fear of malignancy, emphasizing the value of reassurance from a negative endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2396082     DOI: 10.3109/00365529008997594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  22 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative.

Authors:  Kia Saeian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-06

3.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The Helicobacter pylori breath test: a surrogate marker for peptic ulcer disease in dyspeptic patients.

Authors:  K E McColl; A el-Nujumi; L Murray; E el-Omar; D Gillen; A Dickson; A Kelman; T E Hilditch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Bringing science to the art of diagnosis.

Authors:  P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  An evidence-based approach to the management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the era of Helicobacter pylori. Canadian Dyspepsia Working Group.

Authors:  S J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; N Flook; N Chiba; D Armstrong; A Barkun; M Bradette; A Thomson; F Bursey; P Blackshaw; D Frail; P Sinclair
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Use of the Montreal global definition as an assessment of quality of life in reflux disease.

Authors:  R A Sawaya; A Macgill; H P Parkman; F K Friedenberg
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  [Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with dyspepsia. Update 2012].

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; Xavier Calvet; Juan Ferrándiz; Juan Mascort; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Mercè Marzo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.137

9.  Irritable bowel syndrome and upper dyspepsia among the elderly: a study of symptom clusters in a random 70 year old population.

Authors:  L Kay; T Jørgensen; K Schultz-Larsen; M Davidsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  A database on dyspepsia.

Authors:  G P Crean; R J Holden; R P Knill-Jones; A D Beattie; W B James; F M Marjoribanks; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.