Literature DB >> 23960489

Orthognathic surgical norms for a sample of Saudi adults: Hard tissue measurements.

Sahar F Albarakati1, Laila F Baidas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to establish hard tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery for a sample of Saudi adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two lateral cephalometric radiographs for 31 females and 31 males, age range of 22-24 years, were analysed. The mean values of the hard and dental measurements were compared with those of European-American adults using Burstone analysis, as well as comparison between Saudi males and females.
RESULTS: Saudi males had an increased cranial base length, the mandible lied more posterior to maxilla, increased mandibular plane angle and backward rotation of the mandible with less prominent chin, shorter maxillary length, and also less proclination of lower incisors compared to those of European Americans. Saudi females had similar cranial base length and shorter maxillary length than European Americans. In both gender; lower anterior and posterior dental heights were smaller when compared with the European-Americans' values. A significant difference between Saudi males and females was found. Saudi males showed longer cranial base length, larger vertical skeletal proportion, increased dental values, longer maxillary and mandibular length than the female group.
CONCLUSION: This study may be useful in providing racially specific cephalometric norms for diagnosis and treatment planning for orthognathic surgery for a sample of Saudi adults.

Keywords:  Cephalometric norms; Orthognathic surgery; Saudi adults

Year:  2010        PMID: 23960489      PMCID: PMC3723291          DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Dent J        ISSN: 1013-9052


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population.

Authors:  A M Hamdan; W P Rock
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2001-12

2.  Cephalometric evaluation for Saudi population using the Downs and Steiner analysis.

Authors:  Nasser M Al-Jasser
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2005-05-15

3.  Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  C J Burstone; R B James; H Legan; G A Murphy; L A Norton
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1978-04

4.  Cephalometrics: a comparison of five analyses currently used in the diagnosis of dentofacial deformities.

Authors:  G A Wylie; L C Fish; B N Epker
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1987

5.  Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients.

Authors:  A M Connor; F Moshiri
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-02

6.  Age and sex cephalometric norms?

Authors:  A A Gianelly
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1970-05

7.  Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery in black American adults.

Authors:  T R Flynn; R I Ambrogio; S J Zeichner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  M Mouakeh
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents.

Authors:  S E Bishara; E M Abdalla; B J Hoppens
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: hard tissue measurements.

Authors:  Badreia Al-Jame; Jon Artun; Rashed Al-Azemi; Faraj Behbehani; Sana Buhamra
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.927

View more
  1 in total

1.  Computer-Aided Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Study with the Establishment of Burstone Analysis-Derived 3D Norms.

Authors:  Cheng-Ting Ho; Rafael Denadai; Hsin-Chih Lai; Lun-Jou Lo; Hsiu-Hsia Lin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.