Literature DB >> 23958926

No acceleration of UV-induced skin carcinogenesis from evenly spread dietary intake of cyclosporine in contrast to oral bolus dosages.

Pieter Voskamp1, Carolien A Bodmann, Gudrun E Koehl, Cornelis P Tensen, Jan Nico Bouwes Bavinck, Rein Willemze, Edward K Geissler, Frank R de Gruijl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients using the immunosuppressant cyclosporine have an increased risk for developing nonmelanoma skin cancer. Disparate effects of cyclosporine have, however, been reported on UV-induced skin carcinogenesis in mouse experiments. Therefore, we set out to compare three experimental protocols using mice, with the aim to emulate most closely the increased skin cancer risk in organ transplant recipients.
METHODS: UV carcinogenesis was performed in hairless SKH-1 mice by three protocols: dietary cyclosporine and daily UV exposures, dietary cyclosporine after a period of UV exposures, and bolus dosing cyclosporine by gavage and repeated UV exposures.
RESULTS: Using chronic UV exposure, continuous dietary administration of cyclosporine was shown to inhibit tumor formation. Dietary cyclosporine after a period of UV exposures did not affect ensuing UV carcinogenesis. However, in contrast with dietary cyclosporine, bolus dosages of cyclosporine by gavage, resulting in strongly varying blood levels of cyclosporine, increased tumor development in chronically UV-exposed mice. There was no difference in tumor development between mice UV-irradiated during peak or trough levels of cyclosporine in the blood. Time-averaged levels in these mice were similar to those with cyclosporine in the diet.
CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine in bolus doses appears to increase skin cancer development, whereas cyclosporine administration more evenly spread over time does not. Extrapolation to transplant patients suggests that the mode of administrating cyclosporine may be crucial for the increased skin cancer risk and that this risk might be lowered with a more steady release of cyclosporine in the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23958926     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a3dfa3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  3 in total

1.  Inhibition of Akt Enhances the Chemopreventive Effects of Topical Rapamycin in Mouse Skin.

Authors:  Sally E Dickinson; Jaroslav Janda; Jane Criswell; Karen Blohm-Mangone; Erik R Olson; Zhonglin Liu; Christy Barber; Emanuel F Petricoin; Valerie S Calvert; Janine Einspahr; Jesse E Dickinson; Steven P Stratton; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Kathylynn Saboda; Chengcheng Hu; Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong; David S Alberts; G Timothy Bowden
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Protective vaccination against papillomavirus-induced skin tumors under immunocompetent and immunosuppressive conditions: a preclinical study using a natural outbred animal model.

Authors:  Sabrina E Vinzón; Ilona Braspenning-Wesch; Martin Müller; Edward K Geissler; Ingo Nindl; Hermann-Josef Gröne; Kai Schäfer; Frank Rösl
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.823

3.  Association between Use of Hydrochlorothiazide and Risk of Keratinocyte Cancers in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Thibault Letellier; Florent Le Borgne; Clarisse Kerleau; Aurélie Gaultier; Jacques Dantal; Simon Ville
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 8.237

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.