Literature DB >> 23958776

Screening strategies for hip dysplasia: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial.

Lene B Laborie1, Ingvild Ø Engesæter, Trude G Lehmann, Deborah M Eastwood, Lars B Engesæter, Karen Rosendahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Screening for hip dysplasia is controversial. A previous randomized controlled trial revealed that adding universal or selective ultrasound to routine clinical examination gave a nonsignificant reduction in rates of late presenting cases, but with higher treatment rates. This study assesses differences in outcome at skeletal maturity for the 3 newborn screening strategies in terms of radiographic markers of acetabular dysplasia and early degenerative change and avascular necrosis (AVN) secondary to neonatal treatment.
METHODS: From the initial trial including 11 925 newborns, a population-based sample of 3935 adolescents was invited for follow-up at age 18 to 20 years. A standardized weight-bearing anteroposterior view was obtained. The outcomes evaluated were the radiographic findings of dysplasia (center-edge angle, femoral head extrusion-index, acetabular depth-width ratio, Sharp's angle, subjective evaluation of dysplasia) and degenerative change (joint-space width). Signs of AVN were documented.
RESULTS: Of the 3935 subjects invited, 2038 (51.8%) attended the maturity review, of which 2011 (58.2% female patients) were included: 551, 665, and 795 subjects from the universal, selective, and clinical groups, respectively. Rates per group of positive radiographic findings associated with dysplasia or degenerative change varied depending on radiographic marker used. No statistically significant differences were detected between groups. No AVN was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Although both selective and universal ultrasound screenings gave a nonsignificant reduction in rates of late cases when compared with expert clinical programs, we were unable to demonstrate any additional reduction in the rates of radiographic findings associated with acetabular dysplasia or degenerative change at maturity. Increased treatment rates were not associated with AVN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  follow-up studies; hip dysplasia; neonatal screening; randomized controlled trial; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23958776     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

Review 1.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: What has changed in the last 20 years?

Authors:  Pavel Kotlarsky; Reuben Haber; Victor Bialik; Mark Eidelman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 2.  Prevention of rheumatic diseases: strategies, caveats, and future directions.

Authors:  Axel Finckh; Kevin D Deane
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Long-term results of a nationwide general ultrasound screening system for developmental disorders of the hip: the Austrian hip screening program.

Authors:  Christoph Thallinger; Renata Pospischill; Rudolf Ganger; Christof Radler; Christoph Krall; Franz Grill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Selective ultrasound screening is inadequate to identify patients who present with symptomatic adult acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Ernest L Sink; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Katrina Dela Torre; Charles T Price
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Universal or selective ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip? A discussion of the key issues.

Authors:  R Biedermann; D M Eastwood
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 6.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip: update of management.

Authors:  Alfonso Vaquero-Picado; Gaspar González-Morán; Enrique Gil Garay; Luis Moraleda
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-09-17

7.  Risk Factor Assessment and a Ten-Year Experience of DDH Screening in a Well-Child Population.

Authors:  Bahar Kural; Esra Devecioğlu Karapınar; Pınar Yılmazbaş; Tijen Eren; Gülbin Gökçay
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Predictors of Hip Dysplasia at 4 Years in Children with Perinatal Risk Factors.

Authors:  Simon Humphry; Timothy Hall; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Andreas Roposch
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-01-19

9.  Ultrasound of the neonatal hip as a screening tool for DDH: how to screen and differences in screening programs between European countries.

Authors:  Iris Kilsdonk; Melinda Witbreuk; Henk-Jan Van Der Woude
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Hakan Omeroğlu
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.