Literature DB >> 23958586

Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System.

Hany Abdel-Aleem1, Omar M Shaaban, Ahmed I Hassanin, Alaa A Ibraheem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) for cesarean delivery (CD) indications at institutional level.
METHODS: Prospective clinical audits of women delivering by CD at Women's Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, were conducted in 2008 and 2011. The CD rates overall and in each Robson group were calculated, as was the contribution of each group to the overall CD rate. In addition, the CD indications in each group were analyzed.
RESULTS: The CD rate was 32% (443/1357) in 2008 and 38% (626/1628) in 2011. The most common CD indication at both time intervals was a previous CD. Multiparas without uterine scar, a single cephalic term pregnancy, and spontaneous labor (Robson Group 3) comprised the largest group of women undergoing CD, followed by nulliparas with a single cephalic term pregnancy and spontaneous labor (Group 1), and multiparas with a scarred uterus and a single cephalic term pregnancy (Group 5). Group 5 was the largest contributor (30%) to the overall CD rate, followed by Groups 1 and 4 (10% each).
CONCLUSION: The TGCS can be applied at institutional level. It helps in planning strategies for specific subgroups of women to reduce CD rates and improve outcomes.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery; Classification of cesarean delivery; Clinical audit; Ten Group Classification System

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23958586     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement.

Authors:  Adeline A Boatin; Joseph Ngonzi; Gabriel Ganyaglo; Magatte Mbaye; Blair J Wylie; Khady Diouf
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Ever-increasing Caesarean section and its economic burden in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad Rifat Haider; Mohammad Masudur Rahman; Md Moinuddin; Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman; Shakil Ahmed; M Mahmud Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pregnancy outcomes of women with previous caesarean sections: Secondary analysis of World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon; Siwanon Rattanakanokchai; Joshua P Vogel; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Caesarean Section in Peru: Analysis of Trends Using the Robson Classification System.

Authors:  Vilma Tapia; Ana Pilar Betran; Gustavo F Gonzales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania's experience.

Authors:  Justina Kacerauskiene; Egle Bartuseviciene; Dalia Regina Railaite; Meile Minkauskiene; Arnoldas Bartusevicius; Mindaugas Kliucinskas; Renata Simoliuniene; Ruta J Nadisauskiene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Lack of pain relief during labor is blamable for the increase in the women demands towards cesarean delivery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  O M Shaaban; A M Abbas; R A Mohamed; Haa Hafiz
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2017-12

8.  Caesarean section rates analysed using Robson's 10-Group Classification System: a cross-sectional study at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abdella Amano Abdo; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; Achamyelesh Gebretsadik Tekle; Bernt Lindtjørn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.