Literature DB >> 23958079

Understanding nursing students' perspectives on the grading of group work assessments.

Morgan Smith1, John Rogers2.   

Abstract

Grading group work assessments so that students perceive the grade to be fair to all group members is sometimes challenging. This is particularly important in a higher education environment that is increasingly concerned with student perceptions of teaching quality and satisfaction. This article reports on research that compared undergraduate nursing students perceptions of two different approaches to the grading of group work assessment. A survey design was used to identify students' perspectives and preferences for different group work assessment methods. Participants were undergraduate bachelor of nursing students from a large, metropolitan university in Australia. Data analysis indicated that the perceptions of students around group work assessments changed little as they progressed across the program, although students who had experienced the calculation of individual grades for a group assessment preferred this approach. Many believed the grading of group assessments penalised good students and were less reliable than individual assessments. Students maintained the belief that teamwork skills were essential for the registered nurse role. In conclusion group work assessment should only be used when it is the best assessment method to demonstrate student learning of specific objectives. The weighted mark approach is the group work assessment grading approach of choice.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Education; Group work; Nursing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23958079     DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract        ISSN: 1471-5953            Impact factor:   2.281


  3 in total

1.  Flipped classroom instructional approach in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Syeda Sadia Fatima; Fazal Manzoor Arain; Syed Ather Enam
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Using peer review to distribute group work marks equitably between medical students.

Authors:  Alex R Cook; Mikael Hartman; Nan Luo; Judy Sng; Ngan Phoon Fong; Wei Yen Lim; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Mee Lian Wong; Natarajan Rajaraman; Jeannette Jen-Mai Lee; Gerald Choon-Huat Koh
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Challenges of Cooperation between the Pre-hospital and In-hospital Emergency services in the handover of victims of road traffic accidents: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hasan Jamshidi; Reza Khani Jazani; Ahmad Alibabaei; Shahram Alamdari; Majid Najafi Kalyani
Journal:  Invest Educ Enferm       Date:  2019-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.