Literature DB >> 23957638

Comparison of two syngeneic orthotopic murine models of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Mehrdad Nikfarjam1, Dannel Yeo, Hong He, Graham Baldwin, Theodora Fifis, Patricia Costa, Bryan Tan, Eunice Yang, Shu wen Wen, Christopher Christophi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma has an extremely poor prognosis. The use of appropriate in vivo models is essential in devising methods to improve treatment outcomes.
METHODS: A pancreatic adenocarcinoma model based on tumor injection into the pancreatic head was compared with a pancreatic tail injection model in C57/BL6 mice. The murine pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line PAN02, dispersed in Matrigel™, was used for tumor induction.
RESULTS: Tumors developed in all animals in both models. Tumor size was more consistent within the pancreatic tail group at 20 days following induction, with no evidence of metastatic disease. Animals in the pancreatic head injection group showed signs of reduced health by 20 days following injection and developed jaundice. Microscopic liver metastases were noted in some of these animals at this time point. The overall survival of animals at 40 days following tumor induction was significantly lower in the pancreatic head injection group (0% vs. 35%; p < .001). Multiple liver metastases were noted in five of 10 (50%) animals in the head injection group, without evidence of peritoneal metastases. In the pancreatic tail injection group, 18 of 20 (90%) animals had multiple peritoneal metastases, and nine of 20 (45%) animals had evidence of isolated liver deposits. Tumors in both regions of the pancreas had similar histologic characteristics, with a dense fibrotic stroma at the interface between the tumor and the normal pancreas.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic head and tail orthotopic cancer models produce consistent tumors, but the patterns of tumor spread and survival differ according to the site of injection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23957638     DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2013.797057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Surg        ISSN: 0894-1939            Impact factor:   2.533


  6 in total

1.  Construction of orthotopic xenograft mouse models for human pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lei Dai; Caide Lu; X I Yu; Long-Jun Dai; Jeff X Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Orthotopic Models of Pancreatic Cancer to Study PDT.

Authors:  Girgis Obaid; Zhiming Mai; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells attenuate pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model.

Authors:  Ying-Cheng Chen; Ying-Wei Lan; Shiaw-Min Huang; Chih-Ching Yen; Wei Chen; Wan-Ju Wu; Theresa Staniczek; Kowit-Yu Chong; Chuan-Mu Chen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 8.079

4.  Cholecystokinin mediates progression and metastasis of pancreatic cancer associated with dietary fat.

Authors:  Gail L Matters; Timothy K Cooper; Christopher O McGovern; Evan L Gilius; Jiangang Liao; Brian M Barth; Mark Kester; Jill P Smith
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Glaucarubinone Combined with Gemcitabine Improves Pancreatic Cancer Survival in an Immunocompetent Orthotopic Murine Model.

Authors:  Dannel Yeo; Nhi Huynh; John A Beutler; Graham S Baldwin; Hong He; Mehrdad Nikfarjam
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  FRAX597, a PAK1 inhibitor, synergistically reduces pancreatic cancer growth when combined with gemcitabine.

Authors:  Dannel Yeo; Hong He; Oneel Patel; Andrew M Lowy; Graham S Baldwin; Mehrdad Nikfarjam
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.