Literature DB >> 23957323

An investigation into the demographics and motivations of students studying for a chiropractic degree.

Philip Yalden, Christina Cunliffe, Adrian Hunnisett.   

Abstract

Objective : This research aimed to investigate motivations for studying chiropractic, and to determine what students look for in a course/college and potential barriers to studying chiropractic. Methods : The study design was a cross-sectional survey. Following IRB/Ethical approval, a paper-based questionnaire was distributed to students at McTimoney College of Chiropractic. Demographic data were compared to another chiropractic college in the United Kingdom. Results : The questionnaire response rate was 70.8% (n = 121). Motivating factors for studying chiropractic included a desire to help others (54.5%, n = 66), with 44.6% (n = 54) attracted by chiropractic's holistic, drugless approach to health. Previous help from chiropractic influenced 55.4% (n = 67) and 22.3% (n = 27) felt chiropractic had "changed their life." Just over half of the respondents (55.4%, n = 67) viewed the ability to work while studying as extremely important and 73.6% (n = 89) said they could not have studied chiropractic without this. Conclusion : Previous help from chiropractic care was a common motivation for studying chiropractic. The ability to work while studying was seen as vital by many students and, without it, the vast majority felt they could not have studied chiropractic.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23957323      PMCID: PMC3791904          DOI: 10.7899/JCE-13-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Educ        ISSN: 1042-5055


  3 in total

1.  Graduate entry to medical school? Testing some assumptions.

Authors:  I E Rolfe; C Ringland; S-A Pearson
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Planning flexible learning to match the needs of consumers: a national survey.

Authors:  S Ayer; C Smith
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions.

Authors:  Sissel Marie Kongsved; Maja Basnov; Kurt Holm-Christensen; Niels Henrik Hjollund
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of immediate student outcomes following a change in gross anatomy laboratory teaching methodology.

Authors:  Salman Afsharpour; Abigail Gonsalves; Ronald Hosek; Eric Partin
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2018-04-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.