Literature DB >> 23957308

Automatic imitation is reduced in narcissists.

Sukhvinder S Obhi1, Jeremy Hogeveen1, Miranda Giacomin2, Christian H Jordan2.   

Abstract

Narcissism is a personality trait that has been extensively studied in normal populations. Individuals high on subclinical narcissism tend to display an excessive self-focus and reduced concern for others. Does their disregard of others have roots in low-level processes of social perception? We investigated whether narcissism is related to the automatic imitation of observed actions. In the automatic imitation task, participants make cued actions in the presence of action videos displaying congruent or incongruent actions. The difference in response times and accuracy between congruent and incongruent trials (i.e., the interference effect) is a behavioral index of motor resonance in the brain-a process whereby observed actions activate matching motor representations in the observer. We found narcissism to be negatively related to interference in the automatic imitation task, such that high narcissism is associated with reduced imitation. Thus, levels of narcissism predict differences in the tendency to automatically resonate with others, and the pattern of data we observe suggests that a key difference is that high narcissists possess an improved ability to suppress automatic imitation when such imitation would be detrimental to task performance. To the extent that motor resonance is a product of a human mirror system, our data constitute evidence for a link between narcissistic tendencies and mirror system functioning. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23957308     DOI: 10.1037/a0034056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  The influence of group membership on cross-contextual imitation.

Authors:  Oliver Genschow; Simon Schindler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self-other distinction.

Authors:  Daniel Joel Shaw; Kristína Czekóová; Michaela Porubanová
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-10-17

3.  Socioeconomic status and self-other processing: socioeconomic status predicts interference in the automatic imitation task.

Authors:  Sumeet Farwaha; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Automatic Imitation in Comorbid PTSD & Alcohol Use Disorder and Controls: an RCT of Intranasal Oxytocin.

Authors:  Tyler E Morrison; Lize De Coster; Christopher S Stauffer; Jin Wen; Elnaz Ahmadi; Kevin Delucchi; Aoife O'Donovan; Josh Woolley
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.905

5.  Not So Automatic Imitation: Expectation of Incongruence Reduces Interference in Both Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development.

Authors:  Andrew Gordon; Raphael Geddert; Jeremy Hogeveen; Marie K Krug; Sukhvinder Obhi; Marjorie Solomon
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-04

6.  Investigating the Relationship between Stable Personality Characteristics and Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Emily E Butler; Robert Ward; Richard Ramsey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Implicit preference towards slim bodies and weight-stigma modulate the understanding of observed familiar actions.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Stergios Makris
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-06-08

8.  Task-dependent and distinct roles of the temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal cortex in the control of imitation.

Authors:  Jeremy Hogeveen; Sukhvinder S Obhi; Michael J Banissy; Idalmis Santiesteban; Clare Press; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Jeremy Hogeveen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Status and Power Do Not Modulate Automatic Imitation of Intransitive Hand Movements.

Authors:  Harry Farmer; Evan W Carr; Marita Svartdal; Piotr Winkielman; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.