Literature DB >> 23955728

Does nasogastric tube decompression get used less often with laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared with open colectomy?

Noam Shussman1, Maria R Brown, Michael C Johnson, Giovanna Da Silva, Steven D Wexner, Eric G Weiss.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with well-known benefits, one of which is earlier return of bowel function. Since the laparoscopic approach to colon resections was introduced in the early 1990s, it has become the standard of care. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a surgical approach in which dissection is facilitated by the surgeon's hand within the abdominal cavity during laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative ileus and the need for nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression in patients undergoing elective colon resections. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Following institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Included were patients who underwent elective left-sided large bowel resections between 2009 and 2012. Exclusion criteria were urgent operation, stoma creation, ASA IV classification, NGT left in place at the end of surgery, and postoperative anastomotic leakage. Patients were divided into three groups: laparoscopic surgery, HALS, and open surgery. We evaluated the incidence of postoperative ileus and the use of nasogastric decompression in each group.
RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were included in this study; 73 patients underwent open surgery, 89 patients underwent HALS, and 81 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of patients who needed postoperative nasogastric decompression was significantly reduced in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (3.7%) or HALS (4.5%) compared with those who underwent open resection (17.8%). The time from surgery to first flatus and first bowel movement, the time to tolerate solid diet, and the total length of postoperative hospital stay also were all significantly reduced in the laparoscopic and HALS groups compared with the open surgery group. There were no significant differences in any of these measures between the laparoscopic group and the hand-assisted group.
CONCLUSIONS: Like laparoscopy, HALS is associated with less postoperative ileus and necessitates less NGT decompression than does open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955728     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3124-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

Review 1.  Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Abdul-Wahed Nasir Meshikhes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefan Maartense; Michalda S Dunker; J Frederick Slors; Miguel A Cuesta; Dirk J Gouma; Sander J van Deventer; Ad A van Bodegraven; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  R T Schlinkert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.

Authors:  E M Targarona; E Gracia; J Garriga; C Martínez-Bru; M Cortés; R Boluda; L Lerma; M Trías
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Peter W Marcello; James W Fleshman; Jeffrey W Milsom; Thomas E Read; Tracey D Arnell; Elisa H Birnbaum; Daniel L Feingold; Sang W Lee; Matthew G Mutch; Toyooki Sonoda; Yan Yan; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with decreased postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Authors:  Oded Zmora; Eyal Hashavia; Yaron Munz; Marat Khaikin; Moshe Shabtai; Amram Ayalon; Limor Dinur; Danny Rosin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colectomy: results of a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Peter W Marcello; Toyooki Sonoda; Paul Wise; Joel Bauer; Lee Techner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  J-C Kang; M-H Chung; P-C Chao; C-C Yeh; C-W Hsiao; T-Y Lee; S-W Jao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Postoperative ileus: in search of an international consensus on definition, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Olivier Gié; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an analysis of 428 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hain; Léon Maggiori; Cécile Mongin; Justine Prost A la Denise; Yves Panis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.