Literature DB >> 23955289

Reasons for academic honesty and dishonesty with solutions: a study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand.

Marcus A Henning1, Sanya Ram2, Phillipa Malpas3, Richard Sisley4, Andrea Thompson1, Susan J Hawken3.   

Abstract

This paper presents students' views about honest and dishonest actions within the pharmacy and medical learning environments. Students also offered their views on solutions to ameliorating dishonest action. Three research questions were posed in this paper: (1) what reasons would students articulate in reference to engaging in dishonest behaviours? (2) What reasons would students articulate in reference to maintaining high levels of integrity? (3) What strategies would students suggest to decrease engagement in dishonest behaviours and/or promote honest behaviours? The design of the study incorporated an initial descriptive analysis to interpret students' responses to an 18-item questionnaire about justifications for dishonest action. This was followed by a qualitative analysis of students' commentaries in reference to why students would engage in either honest or dishonest action. Finally a qualitative analysis was conducted on students' views regarding solutions to dishonest action. The quantitative results showed that students were more likely to use time management and seriousness justifications for dishonest actions. The qualitative findings found that students' actions (honest or dishonest) were guided by family and friends, the need to do well, issues of morality and institutional guidelines. Students suggested that dishonest action could be ameliorated by external agencies and polarised views between punitive and rewards-based mechanisms were offered. These results suggest that these students engaged in dishonest action for various reasons and solutions addressing dishonest action need to consider diverse mechanisms that likely extend beyond the educational institution. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Education for Health Care Professionals; Education/Programs; Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955289     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Academic Dishonesty: Whose Fault is it Anyway?

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Lauren S Schlesselman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Who would students ask for help in academic cheating? Cross-sectional study of medical students in Croatia.

Authors:  Varja Đogaš; Ana Jerončić; Matko Marušić; Ana Marušić
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Perceptions of plagiarism among undergraduate medical students in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Authors:  Arslaan Javaeed; Abdus Salam Khan; Shafqat Husnain Khan; Sanniya Khan Ghauri
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.