AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of instituting the 2010 Basic Life Support Guidelines on in-hospital pediatric and adolescent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. We hypothesized that quality would improve, but that targets for chest compression (CC) depth would be difficult to achieve. METHODS: Prospective in-hospital observational study comparing CPR quality 24 months before and after release of the 2010 Guidelines. CPR recording/feedback-enabled defibrillators collected CPR data (rate (CC/min), depth (mm), CC fraction (CCF, %), leaning (%>2.5kg)). Audiovisual feedback for depth was: 2005, ≥38mm; 2010, ≥50mm; for rate: 2005, ≥90 and ≤120CC/min; 2010, ≥100 and ≤120CC/min. The primary outcome was average event depth compared with Student's t-test. RESULTS: 45 CPR events (25 before; 20 after) occurred, resulting in 1336 thirty-second epochs (909 before; 427 after). Compared to 2005, average event depth (50±13mm vs. 43±9mm; p=0.047), rate (113±11CC/min vs. 104±8CC/min; p<0.01), and CCF (0.94 [0.93, 0.96] vs. 0.9 [0.85, 0.94]; p=0.013) increased during 2010. CPR epochs during the 2010 period more likely to meet Guidelines for CCF (OR 1.7; CI95: 1.2-2.4; p<0.01), but less likely for rate (OR 0.23; CI95: 0.12-0.44; p<0.01), and depth (OR 0.31; CI95: 0.12-0.86; p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Institution of the 2010 Guidelines was associated with increased CC depth, rate, and CC fraction; yet, achieving 2010 targets for rate and depth was difficult.
AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of instituting the 2010 Basic Life Support Guidelines on in-hospital pediatric and adolescent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. We hypothesized that quality would improve, but that targets for chest compression (CC) depth would be difficult to achieve. METHODS: Prospective in-hospital observational study comparing CPR quality 24 months before and after release of the 2010 Guidelines. CPR recording/feedback-enabled defibrillators collected CPR data (rate (CC/min), depth (mm), CC fraction (CCF, %), leaning (%>2.5kg)). Audiovisual feedback for depth was: 2005, ≥38mm; 2010, ≥50mm; for rate: 2005, ≥90 and ≤120CC/min; 2010, ≥100 and ≤120CC/min. The primary outcome was average event depth compared with Student's t-test. RESULTS: 45 CPR events (25 before; 20 after) occurred, resulting in 1336 thirty-second epochs (909 before; 427 after). Compared to 2005, average event depth (50±13mm vs. 43±9mm; p=0.047), rate (113±11CC/min vs. 104±8CC/min; p<0.01), and CCF (0.94 [0.93, 0.96] vs. 0.9 [0.85, 0.94]; p=0.013) increased during 2010. CPR epochs during the 2010 period more likely to meet Guidelines for CCF (OR 1.7; CI95: 1.2-2.4; p<0.01), but less likely for rate (OR 0.23; CI95: 0.12-0.44; p<0.01), and depth (OR 0.31; CI95: 0.12-0.86; p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Institution of the 2010 Guidelines was associated with increased CC depth, rate, and CC fraction; yet, achieving 2010 targets for rate and depth was difficult.
Authors: M P Feneley; G W Maier; K B Kern; J W Gaynor; S A Gall; A B Sanders; K Raessler; L H Muhlbaier; J S Rankin; G A Ewy Journal: Circulation Date: 1988-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G W Maier; J R Newton; J A Wolfe; G S Tyson; C O Olsen; D D Glower; J A Spratt; J W Davis; M P Feneley; J S Rankin Journal: Circulation Date: 1986-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J A Wolfe; G W Maier; J R Newton; D D Glower; G S Tyson; J A Spratt; J S Rankin; C O Olsen Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1988-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Stuart H Friess; Utpal Bhalala; Matthew R Maltese; Maryam Y Naim; George Bratinov; Dana Niles; Vinay M Nadkarni; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Dana P Edelson; Benjamin S Abella; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Lars Wik; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Raina M Merchant; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Petter A Steen; Lance B Becker Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Benjamin French; Dana E Niles; Aaron Donoghue; Alexis A Topjian; Akira Nishisaki; Jessica Leffelman; Heather Wolfe; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni; Peter A Meaney Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Ryan W Morgan; Alexis A Topjian; Yan Wang; Natalie J Atkin; Todd J Kilbaugh; Francis X McGowan; Robert A Berg; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Robert M Sutton; Adam S Himebauch Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: R J MacKinnon; R Stoeter; C Doherty; C Fullwood; A Cheng; V Nadkarni; T Stenfors-Hayes; T P Chang Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2015-10-06
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Erin Case; Siobhan P Brown; Dianne L Atkins; Vinay M Nadkarni; Jonathan Kaltman; Clifton Callaway; Ahamed Idris; Graham Nichol; Jamie Hutchison; Ian R Drennan; Michael Austin; Mohamud Daya; Sheldon Cheskes; Jack Nuttall; Heather Herren; James Christenson; Dug Andrusiek; Christian Vaillancourt; James J Menegazzi; Thomas D Rea; Robert A Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Gene Yong-Kwang Ong; Aloysius Jian Feng Ang; Amirzeb S O Aurangzeb; Elisabeth Sue Shuen Fong; Jun Yuan Tan; Zhao Jin Chen; Yiong Huak Chan; Phua Hwee Tang; Jen Heng Pek; Ian Maconochie; Kee Chong Ng; Vinay Nadkarni Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2021-03-27
Authors: Robert M Sutton; Ron W Reeder; William Landis; Kathleen L Meert; Andrew R Yates; John T Berger; Christopher J Newth; Joseph A Carcillo; Patrick S McQuillen; Rick E Harrison; Frank W Moler; Murray M Pollack; Todd C Carpenter; Daniel A Notterman; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 6.251