Literature DB >> 23954536

What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment.

Ali Borji1, Dicky N Sihite, Laurent Itti.   

Abstract

Eye tracking has become the de facto standard measure of visual attention in tasks that range from free viewing to complex daily activities. In particular, saliency models are often evaluated by their ability to predict human gaze patterns. However, fixations are not only influenced by bottom-up saliency (computed by the models), but also by many top-down factors. Thus, comparing bottom-up saliency maps to eye fixations is challenging and has required that one tries to minimize top-down influences, for example by focusing on early fixations on a stimulus. Here we propose two complementary procedures to evaluate visual saliency. We seek whether humans have explicit and conscious access to the saliency computations believed to contribute to guiding attention and eye movements. In the first experiment, 70 observers were asked to choose which object stands out the most based on its low-level features in 100 images each containing only two objects. Using several state-of-the-art bottom-up visual saliency models that measure local and global spatial image outliers, we show that maximum saliency inside the selected object is significantly higher than inside the non-selected object and the background. Thus spatial outliers are a predictor of human judgments. Performance of this predictor is boosted by including object size as an additional feature. In the second experiment, observers were asked to draw a polygon circumscribing the most salient object in cluttered scenes. For each of 120 images, we show that a map built from annotations of 70 observers explains eye fixations of another 20 observers freely viewing the images, significantly above chance (dataset by Bruce and Tsotsos (2009); shuffled AUC score 0.62±0.07, chance 0.50, t-test p<0.05). We conclude that fixations agree with saliency judgments, and classic bottom-up saliency models explain both. We further find that computational models specifically designed for fixation prediction slightly outperform models designed for salient object detection over both types of data (i.e., fixations and objects). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bottom-up saliency; Explicit saliency judgment; Eye movements; Free viewing; Object-based attention; Space-based attention

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954536     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Unpredictable movement as an anti-predator strategy.

Authors:  Graham Richardson; Patrick Dickinson; Oliver H P Burman; Thomas W Pike
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  What do saliency models predict?

Authors:  Kathryn Koehler; Fei Guo; Sheng Zhang; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Priority coding in the visual system.

Authors:  Nicole C Rust; Marlene R Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Learning rational temporal eye movement strategies.

Authors:  David Hoppe; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Pictorial low-level features in mental images: evidence from eye fixations.

Authors:  Corinna S Martarelli; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of impulse responses to figure motion in optic flow neurons.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Lee; H Olof Jönsson; Karin Nordström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Investigating bottom-up auditory attention.

Authors:  Emine Merve Kaya; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  How is visual salience computed in the brain? Insights from behaviour, neurobiology and modelling.

Authors:  Richard Veale; Ziad M Hafed; Masatoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Early Visual Processing of Feature Saliency Tasks: A Review of Psychophysical Experiments.

Authors:  Shiva Kamkar; Hamid Abrishami Moghaddam; Reza Lashgari
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-26

10.  Learned prioritization yields attentional biases through selection history.

Authors:  Jaap Munneke; Jennifer E Corbett; Erik van der Burg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.