Literature DB >> 23954167

The impact of superimposition choice in geometric morphometric approaches to morphological integration.

Karen L Baab1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23954167     DOI： 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN： 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem.

Authors:  Anjali Goswami; Akinobu Watanabe; Ryan N Felice; Carla Bardua; Anne-Claire Fabre; P David Polly
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Sexual selection leads to positive allometry but not sexual dimorphism in the expression of horn shape in the blue wildebeest, Connochaetes taurinus.

Authors:  Chloé Gerstenhaber; Andrew Knapp
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-11

Review 3.  A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes.

Authors:  Ryan N Felice; Marcela Randau; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull.

Authors:  Carla Bardua; Mark Wilkinson; David J Gower; Emma Sherratt; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Local Superimpositions Facilitate Morphometric Analysis of Complex Articulating Structures.

Authors:  Daniel Rhoda; Marion Segall; Olivier Larouche; Kory Evans; Kenneth D Angielczyk
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.326
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.