Annick Alpérovitch1, Martin Blachier1, Aïcha Soumaré1, Karen Ritchie2, Jean-François Dartigues3, Sandrine Richard-Harston3, Christophe Tzourio4. 1. INSERM, U708 Neuroepidemiology, Paris, France; University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France. 2. INSERM, U1061, La Colombière Hospital, Montpellier, France; Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK; University Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France. 3. INSERM, U897, Bordeaux, France; University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 4. INSERM, U708 Neuroepidemiology, Paris, France; University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: christophe.tzourio@u-bordeaux2.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between blood pressure and dementia is incompletely understood in elderly individuals. Blood pressure variability may have a role in the risk of dementia. METHODS: This investigation was a cohort study of 6506 elderly individuals followed-up for 8 years (1999-2001 through 2008) with assessments at years 2, 4, and 7-8. Blood pressure was measured by electronic devices at baseline and at 2- and 4-year follow-up examinations. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate the risk of incident dementia according to blood pressure (means and coefficients of variation of the three measures). RESULTS: During the 40,151 person-years of follow-up 474 participants developed dementia. We observed no association between mean blood pressure and risk of dementia. In contrast, an increase of 1 standard deviation in the coefficient of variation of blood pressure was associated with a 10% increased risk of dementia. Analysis by deciles of the coefficient of variation showed that the higher the variability, the higher the risk of dementia (P<.02 for trend). In the fully adjusted Cox model, the risk of dementia for those in the highest decile of the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was 1.77 (1.17-2.69) compared with the lowest decile. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, variability of blood pressure during follow-up was associated with an increased risk of incident dementia, whereas mean blood pressure was not. Limitation of blood pressure fluctuation may be an important target to preserve cognitive function in the elderly.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between blood pressure and dementia is incompletely understood in elderly individuals. Blood pressure variability may have a role in the risk of dementia. METHODS: This investigation was a cohort study of 6506 elderly individuals followed-up for 8 years (1999-2001 through 2008) with assessments at years 2, 4, and 7-8. Blood pressure was measured by electronic devices at baseline and at 2- and 4-year follow-up examinations. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate the risk of incident dementia according to blood pressure (means and coefficients of variation of the three measures). RESULTS: During the 40,151 person-years of follow-up 474 participants developed dementia. We observed no association between mean blood pressure and risk of dementia. In contrast, an increase of 1 standard deviation in the coefficient of variation of blood pressure was associated with a 10% increased risk of dementia. Analysis by deciles of the coefficient of variation showed that the higher the variability, the higher the risk of dementia (P<.02 for trend). In the fully adjusted Cox model, the risk of dementia for those in the highest decile of the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was 1.77 (1.17-2.69) compared with the lowest decile. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, variability of blood pressure during follow-up was associated with an increased risk of incident dementia, whereas mean blood pressure was not. Limitation of blood pressure fluctuation may be an important target to preserve cognitive function in the elderly.
Authors: Georgina E Crichton; Merrill F Elias; Gregory A Dore; Rachael V Torres; Michael A Robbins Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Siny Tsang; Scott A Sperling; Moon Ho Park; Ira M Helenius; Ishan C Williams; Carol Manning Journal: Cogn Behav Neurol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 1.600
Authors: Bo Qin; Anthony J Viera; Paul Muntner; Brenda L Plassman; Lloyd J Edwards; Linda S Adair; Barry M Popkin; Michelle A Mendez Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 10.190