Literature DB >> 23954022

Does interhemispheric communication relate to the bilateral function of muscles? A study of scapulothoracic muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

D Matthews1, P Murtagh, A Risso, G Jones, C M Alexander.   

Abstract

Interhemispheric connections have been demonstrated between the motor cortex controlling muscle pairs. However, these investigations have tended to concentrate upon hand muscles. We have extended these investigations to proximal muscles that control the scapula upon the trunk and help to move and stabilise the shoulder. Using a paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, the interhemispheric interactions between different shoulder girdle muscle pairs, serratus anterior, upper trapezius and lower trapezius were investigated. Test motor evoked potentials were conditioned using conditioning pulse intensities of 80% and 120% of active motor threshold at three different condition-test intervals, during three different tasks. Interhemispheric inhibition was observed in upper trapezius using a conditioning intensity of 120% and condition-test interval of 8 ms (17 ± 18%, p < 0.007). A trend towards inhibition was observed in lower trapezius and serratus anterior using a conditioning intensity of 120% and a condition-test interval of 8 ms (13 ± 22%; p < 0.07 and 10 ± 19% respectively; p < 0.07). No interhemispheric facilitation was evoked. The study demonstrates that a low level of interhemispheric inhibition rather than interhemispheric facilitation could be evoked between these muscle pairs.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  AMT; C-T interval; FDI; IHF; IHI; Interhemispheric facilitation; Interhemispheric inhibition; M1; MEP; MVC; Motor control; TMS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Trunk muscles; active motor threshold; condition-test interval; first dorsal interossei; interhemispheric facilitation; interhemispheric inhibition; maximum voluntary contraction; motor evoked potential; primary motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954022     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  6 in total

1.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Interhemispheric interactions between trunk muscle representations of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Loyda Jean-Charles; Jean-Francois Nepveu; Joan E Deffeyes; Guillaume Elgbeili; Numa Dancause; Dorothy Barthélemy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Dance combined with magnetic pulse stimulates the ability of walk and balance in elder people.

Authors:  Tao Lu; Qing-Hua Song; Rong-Mei Xu; Yan-Hua Guo; Feng Wang; Jian-Ping Hu; Yi Wang; Li-Yan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

4.  Effect of various hand position widths on scapular stabilizing muscles during the push-up plus exercise in healthy people.

Authors:  Yanjinsuren Batbayar; Daisuke Uga; Rie Nakazawa; Masaaki Sakamoto
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-08-21

Review 5.  Novel Neuromodulation Techniques to Assess Interhemispheric Communication in Neural Injury and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; Galit Pelled
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Task-Based Functional Connectivity and Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent Activation During Within-Scanner Performance of Lumbopelvic Motor Tasks: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Max K Jordon; Jill Campbell Stewart; Sheri P Silfies; Paul F Beattie
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.