Literature DB >> 23953752

Role of minor salivary glands in developing patient-rated xerostomia and sticky saliva during day and night.

Ivo Beetz1, Cornelis Schilstra, Arjan Visink, Arjen van der Schaaf, Henk P Bijl, Bernard F A M van der Laan, Roel J H M Steenbakkers, Johannes A Langendijk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the relationship between xerostomia during the day (XERday) and night (XERnight) and sticky saliva during the day (STICday) and night (STICnight) and dose distributions in different major and minor salivary glands among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CHRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population was composed of 201 consecutive HNC patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). All patients were included in a standard follow up programme in which acute and late side effects and quality of life (QoL) were prospectively assessed, prior to, during and after treatment. The primary endpoints were XERday, XERnight, STICday, STICnight as assessed by the Groningen Radiotherapy Induced Xerostomia questionnaire (GRIX) six months after completion of treatment. Organs at risk (OARs) potentially involved in salivary function were delineated on planning-CT, including the parotid, submandibular and sublingual glands and the minor glands in the soft palate, buccal mucosa and lips. Patients with moderate-to-severe xerostomia or moderate-to-severe sticky saliva, respectively, at baseline were excluded. In order to determine which salivary glands were most important, a multivariate logistic regression analysis with an extended bootstrapping technique was used.
RESULTS: In total, 29% and 19% of the cases suffered from XERday and XERnight, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that baseline xerostomia and the mean parotid gland dose were the most important predictors for XERday and XERnight. At 6months after (CH)RT, 10% and 12% of the cases reported STICday and STICnight respectively. We were not able to identify prognostic factors related to dose distributions with regard to STICday. The mean submandibular gland dose was associated with STICnight. Baseline xerostomia and sticky saliva scores on the GRIX were associated with XERday, XERnight, STICday. Increasing age was correlated with both XERnight and STICnight.
CONCLUSION: Organs at risk for XERday and STICday are similar to organs at risk for XERnight and STICnight.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; Radiotherapy; Sticky saliva; Xerostomia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953752     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of late sequelae after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Primož Strojan; Katherine A Hutcheson; Avraham Eisbruch; Jonathan J Beitler; Johannes A Langendijk; Anne W M Lee; June Corry; William M Mendenhall; Robert Smee; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 2.  The humanistic burden of head and neck cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Erika Wissinger; Ingolf Griebsch; Juliane Lungershausen; Michael Byrnes; Karin Travers; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer reduces rates of late xerostomia.

Authors:  Jianzhong Cao; Xiaodong Zhang; Bo Jiang; Jiayun Chen; Xiaochun Wang; Li Wang; Narayan Sahoo; X Ronald Zhu; Rong Ye; Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; C David Fuller; G Brandon Gunn; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 6.901

4.  Prevalence of swallowing and speech problems in daily life after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer based on cut-off scores of the patient-reported outcome measures SWAL-QOL and SHI.

Authors:  Rico N Rinkel; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Patricia Doornaert; Jan Buter; Remco de Bree; Johannes A Langendijk; Neil K Aaronson; C René Leemans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The impact of tongue-deviating and tongue-depressing oral stents on long-term radiation-associated symptoms in oropharyngeal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sonja Stieb; Ismael Perez-Martinez; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Stockton Rock; Nimit Bajaj; Tanaya S Deshpande; Mohamed Zaid; Adam S Garden; Ryan P Goepfert; Richard Cardoso; Renata Ferrarotto; Jay P Reddy; Jack Phan; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Eugene J Koay; Steven J Frank; C David Fuller; G Brandon Gunn
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09

Review 6.  Regional Responses in Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Damage.

Authors:  Daniëlle C Voshart; Julia Wiedemann; Peter van Luijk; Lara Barazzuol
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Hazards of sparing the ipsilateral parotid gland in the node-positive neck with intensity modulated radiation therapy: Spatial analysis of regional recurrence risk.

Authors:  Allen M Chen; Taeko Yoshizaki; Pin-Chieh Wang; Darlene Veruttipong; Phillip J Beron; Robert Chin; Argin G Mikaeilian; Minsong Cao
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-12-14

8.  A systematic review of health economic evaluations of proton beam therapy for adult cancer: Appraising methodology and quality.

Authors:  David A Jones; Joel Smith; Xue W Mei; Maria A Hawkins; Tim Maughan; Frank van den Heuvel; Thomas Mee; Karen Kirkby; Norman Kirkby; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.