Literature DB >> 23953702

Effect of through-plane and twisting motion on left ventricular strain calculation: direct comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Victor Chien-Chia Wu1, Masaaki Takeuchi, Kyoko Otani, Nobuhiko Haruki, Hidetoshi Yoshitani, Masahito Tamura, Haruhiko Abe, Fen-Chiung Lin, Yutaka Otsuji.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of out-of-plane motion on discrepancies in strain measurements between two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography.
METHODS: Two-dimensional and 3D data sets were acquired in 54 patients. Using 2D and 3D speckle-tracking software, global circumferential strain (CS) and longitudinal strain (LS) as well as CS and LS at three left ventricular (LV) levels was measured. The effect of through-plane motion was assessed by mitral annular displacement.
RESULTS: Although a good correlation of global CS was noted between the two methods (r = 0.80, P < .01), mean values of global CS were significantly higher on 3D compared with 2D echocardiography. Correlations of CS and their mean differences were 0.65 and -4.61 at the basal level, 0.76 and -4.17 at the midventricular level, and 0.60 and -2.23 at the apical level, respectively. Correlation of global CS between the two methods was higher in patients who showed mitral annular displacement < 9.4 mm (r = 0.81) compared with those with mitral annular displacement ≥ 9.4 mm (r = 0.61). A good correlation of global LS (r = 0.89, P < .01) was noted, with no significant bias. Correlations of LS and their mean differences were 0.52 and 1.59 at the basal level, 0.89 and -1.17 at the midventricular level, and 0.73 and 1.46 at the apical level, respectively. Correlation of LS between the two methods was higher in patients who showed LV twist < 12.2° (r = 0.94) compared with patients with LV twist ≥ 12.2° (r = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS: Through-plane motion produced discrepancies in CS measurements, especially at the LV basal level. Larger bias of LS at the basal and apical LV levels compared with the midventricular level between the two methods suggests that LV twisting also affects the calculation of 2D LS.
Copyright © 2013 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D; 3D; CS; Circumferential strain; LS; LV; Left ventricular; Left ventricular mechanics; Longitudinal strain; MAD; Mitral annular displacement; STE; Speckle-tracking echocardiography; Strain; Three-dimensional; Twist; Two-dimensional

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953702     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  18 in total

Review 1.  Strain, strain rate, torsion, and twist: echocardiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Anders Opdahl; Thomas Helle-Valle; Helge Skulstad; Otto A Smiseth
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Novel mesh-derived right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain analysis by intraoperative three-dimensional transoesophageal speckle-tracking echocardiography: a comparison with conventional parameters.

Authors:  Marius Keller; Tobias Lang; Andreas Schilling; Martina Nowak-Machen; Peter Rosenberger; Harry Magunia
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Current Status and Real-Life Applications.

Authors:  Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Masaaki Takeuchi
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  Age- and Sex-Related Influences on Left Ventricular Mechanics in Elderly Individuals Free of Prevalent Heart Failure: The ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities).

Authors:  Chung-Lieh Hung; Alexandra Gonçalves; Amil M Shah; Susan Cheng; Dalane Kitzman; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Three-dimensional myocardial strain correlates with murine left ventricular remodelling severity post-infarction.

Authors:  Arvin H Soepriatna; A Kevin Yeh; Abigail D Clifford; Semih E Bezci; Grace D O'Connell; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Regional dynamics of fractal dimension of the left ventricular endocardium from cine computed tomography images.

Authors:  Ashish Manohar; Lorenzo Rossini; Gabrielle Colvert; Davis M Vigneault; Francisco Contijoch; Marcus Y Chen; Juan C Del Alamo; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-11-08

Review 7.  Incorporating three-dimensional echocardiography into clinical practice.

Authors:  Kazuaki Tanabe; Kazuto Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-09-11

8.  Clinical usefulness of right ventricular 3D area strain in the assessment of treatment effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison with 2D feature-tracking MRI.

Authors:  Masateru Kawakubo; Yuzo Yamasaki; Takeshi Kamitani; Koji Sagiyama; Yuko Matsuura; Takuya Hino; Kohtaro Abe; Kazuya Hosokawa; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Two-dimensional and three-dimensional left ventricular deformation analysis: a study in competitive athletes.

Authors:  Flavio D'Ascenzi; Marco Solari; Michele Mazzolai; Matteo Cameli; Matteo Lisi; Valentina Andrei; Marta Focardi; Marco Bonifazi; Sergio Mondillo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Vectors through a cross-sectional image (VCI): A visualization method for four-dimensional motion analysis for cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yoshinori Funama; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Takeshi Nakaura; Seitaro Oda; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirata; Yuji Iyama; Yasunori Nagayama; Toshihiro Fukui; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Katsuyuki Taguchi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.