Literature DB >> 23953588

Association of allelic combinations of FSHR gene polymorphisms with ovarian response.

Swapna S Desai1, Swati K Achrekar, Smita R Paranjape, Sadhana K Desai, Vijay S Mangoli, Smita D Mahale.   

Abstract

During an IVF protocol, exogenous FSH is administered to women for ovulation induction. The ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation is variable and unpredictable in these women. The FSHR is the most studied gene in relation to ovarian response. The association of a FSHR gene polymorphism at position 680 (p.Asn680Ser) with ovarian response has been well documented. Recently, a polymorphism at position -29 in the 5'-untranslated region of FSHR (g.-29G>A) has been reported to be associated with poor ovarian response and reduced FSHR expression. The present study evaluated the combined effect of the polymorphisms at positions -29 and 680 of FSHR with type of ovarian response and receptor expression. The two FSHR gene polymorphisms together formed four discrete haplotypes and nine allelic combinations. Various clinical parameters revealed that 75% of the subjects with A/A-Asn/Asn genotype were poor ovarian responders (odds ratio 7.92; P=0.009). The relative FSHR mRNA expression in granulosa cells indicated that subjects with A/A-Asn/Asn genotype express significantly lower level of FSHR as compared to the subjects with G/G-Asn/Ser genotype (P=0.029). These results indicate that A/A-Asn/Asn genotype could be used as a potential marker to predict poor ovarian response. The action of FSH is mediated by its receptor (FSHR) present on the granulosa cells in the ovary. Any alterations in the hormone or its receptor are likely to disrupt its normal function, thus causing infertility. Several alterations (mutations/polymorphisms) of the FSHR gene have been reported in women with primary or secondary amenorrhoea. It has also been reported that FSHR gene polymorphisms are associated with variable ovarian response to FSH stimulation during IVF. Women may show poor or normal or hyperovarian response to FSH stimulation. It is well documented that the level of FSHR expression has a great effect on FSH action and is associated with ovarian response. In the present study, we screened normally menstruating women undergoing IVF due to tubal/male factor or unexplained infertility. We analysed two polymorphisms of FSHR, g-29G>A and p.Asn680Ser, in these women. In the subjects studied, 75% women with A/A-Asn/Asn genotype were observed to be poor ovarian responders to FSH stimulation. FSHR expression at the transcript level was observed to be significantly lower in women with A/A-Asn/Asn genotype as compared to women with G/G-Asn/Ser genotype. We also observed that women with A/A-Ser/Ser genotype were not present in the study population. These findings indicate the significance of A/A-Asn/Asn genotype as a predictive marker for poor ovarian response to FSH stimulation.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FSH; FSHR; genotype analysis; poor ovarian response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953588     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  10 in total

1.  The carriers of the A/G-G/G allelic combination of the c.2039 A>G and c.-29 G>A FSH receptor polymorphisms retrieve the highest number of oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Adolfo Allegra; Angelo Marino; Stefania Raimondo; Antonio Maiorana; Salvatore Gullo; Piero Scaglione; Aldo Volpes; Riccardo Alessandro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Histone demethylase KDM4A and KDM4B expression in granulosa cells from women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Adam J Krieg; Sarah R Mullinax; Frances Grimstad; Kaitlin Marquis; Elizabeth Constance; Yan Hong; Sacha A Krieg; Katherine F Roby
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  An in silico model using prognostic genetic factors for ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation: A systematic review.

Authors:  B S Eisele; G C Villalba Silva; C Bessow; R Donato; V K Genro; J S Cunha-Filho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Genotyping common FSHR polymorphisms based on competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons (CADMA).

Authors:  Tanni Borgbo; Lasse Sommer Kristensen; Ida Lindgren; Claus Yding Andersen; Lise Lotte Hansen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Spontaneous Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome with FSH Receptor Gene Mutation: Two Rare Case Reports.

Authors:  Emsal Pinar Topdagi Yilmaz; Omer Erkan Yapca; Yunus Emre Topdagi; Seray Kaya Topdagi; Yakup Kumtepe
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10-15

Review 6.  Role of the Extracellular and Intracellular Loops of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Its Function.

Authors:  Antara A Banerjee; Smita D Mahale
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Association of follicle stimulating hormone receptor promoter with ovarian response in IVF-ET patients.

Authors:  Wang Dan; Gao Jing; Xia Liangbin; Zhang Ting; Zeng Ying
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-11

8.  The Impact of Genetic Variation and Gene Expression Level of The Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor on Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  Zeinab Ghezelayagh; Mehdi Totonchi; Shabnam Zarei-Moradi; Ommolbanin Asadpour; Saman Maroufizadeh; Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi; Hamid Gourabi; Anahita Mohseni-Meybodi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  The Role of FSHR SNPs and AMH in Follicular Fluid and Serum in Ovarian Response during COS: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elli Anagnostou; Despina Mavrogianni; Ilectra-Niki Prifti; Evangelia Dimitroulia; Athanasios Protopapas; Peter Drakakis; Dimitrios Loutradis
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 10.  Genetic determination of the ovarian reserve: a literature review.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Moiseeva; Varvara A Kudryavtseva; Vladimir N Nikolenko; Marine M Gevorgyan; Ara L Unanyan; Anastassia A Bakhmet; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.234

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.