Literature DB >> 23953364

Children in the public benefit system at risk of maltreatment: identification via predictive modeling.

Rhema Vaithianathan1, Tim Maloney, Emily Putnam-Hornstein, Nan Jiang.   

Abstract

A growing body of research links child abuse and neglect to a range of negative short- and long-term health outcomes. Determining a child's risk of maltreatment at or shortly after birth provides an opportunity for the delivery of targeted prevention services. This study presents findings from a predictive risk model (PRM) developed to estimate the likelihood of substantiated maltreatment among children enrolled in New Zealand's public benefit system. The objective was to explore the potential use of administrative data for targeting prevention and early intervention services to children and families. A data set of integrated public benefit and child protection records for children born in New Zealand between January 1, 2003, and June 1, 2006, was used to develop a risk algorithm using stepwise probit modeling. Data were analyzed in 2012. The final model included 132 variables and produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 76%. Among children in the top decile of risk, 47.8% had been substantiated for maltreatment by age 5 years. Of all children substantiated for maltreatment by age 5 years, 83% had been enrolled in the public benefit system before age 2 years. This analysis demonstrates that PRMs can be used to generate risk scores for substantiated maltreatment. Although a PRM cannot replace more-comprehensive clinical assessments of abuse and neglect risk, this approach provides a simple and cost-effective method of targeting early prevention services.
Copyright © 2013 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953364     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  9 in total

Review 1.  Seeing the Forest in Family Violence Research: Moving to a Family-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Gunjan Tiyyagura; Elizabeth M Bloemen; Rachel Berger; Tony Rosen; Tara Harris; Gloria Jeter; Daniel Lindberg
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Predictive Risk Modeling for Recurrence of Child Maltreatment Using Cases from the National Child Maltreatment Data System in Korea: Exploratory Data Analysis Using Data Mining Algorithm.

Authors:  Jungtae Choi; Kihyun Kim
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2022-10-17

3.  Bias and Objectivity When Evaluating Social Risk Factors for Physical Abuse: of Babies and Bathwater.

Authors:  Daniel M Lindberg
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  A public health response to data interoperability to prevent child maltreatment.

Authors:  Loc H Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Foster Care: How We Can, and Should, Do More for Maltreated Children.

Authors:  Sarah A Font; Elizabeth T Gershoff
Journal:  Soc Policy Rep       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Predictive Risk Modelling to Prevent Child Maltreatment and Other Adverse Outcomes for Service Users: Inside the 'Black Box' of Machine Learning.

Authors:  Philip Gillingham
Journal:  Br J Soc Work       Date:  2015-04-08

7.  Do data from child protective services and the police enhance modelling of perinatal risk for paediatric abusive head trauma? A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Patrick Kelly; John M D Thompson; Santuri Rungan; Shanthi Ameratunga; Timothy Jelleyman; Teuila Percival; Hinemoa Elder; Edwin A Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Is It Harmful? A Thomistic Perspective on Risk Science in Social Welfare.

Authors:  Saša Horvat; Piotr Roszak; Brian J Taylor
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-11-08

9.  Using family network data in child protection services.

Authors:  Alex James; Jeanette McLeod; Shaun Hendy; Kip Marks; Delia Rusu; Syen Nik; Michael J Plank
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.