Literature DB >> 23953069

Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH.

Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan1, Nguyen Khanh Linh, Ho Manh Tuong, P C Wong, Colin M Howles.   

Abstract

This pilot study compared the efficacy and safety of two simple dosing algorithms, one based on anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) and the other on the antral follicle count (AFC), to determine the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in 348 women. Patients were randomized to a predefined AMH- or AFC-based algorithm. The proportion of cycles with the desired response was similar when rFSH dose was determined using AMH or AFC (35.2% versus 28.4%). There was a significant difference between the groups in the proportion of cycles with a hyperresponse (8.6% and 17.4%, but the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was similar (1.1% and 4.6%). There were no significant differences between two groups in outcomes, including implantation (19.3% versus 19.0%), clinical pregnancy (38.0% versus 46.9%), multiple pregnancy (16.5% versus 15.2%) and miscarriage (7.0% versus 8.3%). However, statistically significant differences in ovarian response were evident among the AMH and AFC subgroups: for AMH, Desired and Hypo; for AFC, Hypo and Hyper. This pilot study provides information for developing protocols to further validate the use of either AMH or AFC to guide the starting dose of rFSH in ovarian stimulation. The ideal outcome for couples undergoing IVF treatment is the birth of a healthy baby. One factor that might influence this is retrieving an adequate number of eggs, which are obtained using various treatment protocols. A group of drugs called gonadotrophins have been used for more than 20years to stimulate the ovaries to produce eggs. However, the dose to start treatment has not been clearly defined. A few studies have looked at ways to use the best gonadotrophin dose for each woman, but to be useful in the clinic any approach needs to be simple and easy to use. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of two simple approaches to determining the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF. One was based on the concentration of a hormone secreted by developing eggs (anti-Müllerian hormone; AMH) and the other on the number of developing follicles (antral follicle count; AFC). The number of cycles achieving the desired response in terms of number of eggs was similar when rFSH dose was guided using AMH or AFC, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was also similar. In addition, rates of clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy and miscarriage did not differ between the two groups. However, patients with low AMH concentrations or low AFC had a poor response to ovarian stimulation. This pilot study provides useful information from which new studies can further assess these approaches to personalizing treatment during IVF.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FSH; anti-Müllerian hormone; antral follicle count; assisted reproduction technology; ovarian stimulation; randomized study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953069     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  18 in total

1.  Effect of GnRHa ovulation trigger dose on follicular fluid characteristics and granulosa cell gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Thi Ngoc Lan Vuong; M T Ho; T Q Ha; M Brehm Jensen; C Yding Andersen; P Humaidan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ovarian biomarkers predict controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation treatment in Singapore.

Authors:  Ryan Wai Kheong Lee; Lay Wai Khin; Marianne Sybille Hendricks; Heng Hao Tan; Sadhana Nadarajah; Nancy Wen Sim Tee; Seong-Feei Loh; Bee Choo Tai; Jerry Ky Chan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 3.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve: What have we learned, and what should we know?

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-23

4.  Baseline AMH Level Associated With Ovulation Following Ovulation Induction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Anne Z Steiner; William D Schlaff; Ruben Alvero; Gregory M Christman; Peter R Casson; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: a contemporary critical appraisal.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Moshe Ben-Ami; Izhar Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Cumulative delivery rate per aspiration IVF/ICSI cycle in POSEIDON patients: a real-world evidence study of 9073 patients.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Hakan Yarali; Lan N Vuong; José F Carvalho; İrem Y Özbek; Mehtap Polat; Ho L Le; Toan D Pham; Tuong M Ho; Peter Humaidan; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah F Lensen; Jack Wilkinson; Jori A Leijdekkers; Antonio La Marca; Ben Willem J Mol; Jane Marjoribanks; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

8.  Cell-free DNA in Human Follicular Microenvironment: New Prognostic Biomarker to Predict in vitro Fertilization Outcomes.

Authors:  Sabine Traver; Elodie Scalici; Tiffany Mullet; Nicolas Molinari; Claire Vincens; Tal Anahory; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Maximizing the clinical utility of antimüllerian hormone testing in women's health.

Authors:  Benjamin Leader; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  How to personalize ovarian stimulation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Giovanna Sighinolfi; Valentina Grisendi; Antonio La Marca
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.