Literature DB >> 23953062

Observing object lifting errors modulates cortico-spinal excitability and improves object lifting performance.

Gavin Buckingham1, Jeremy D Wong2, Minnie Tang3, Paul L Gribble4, Melvyn A Goodale5.   

Abstract

Observing the actions of others has been shown to modulate cortico-spinal excitability and affect behaviour. However, the sensorimotor consequences of observing errors are not well understood. Here, participants watched actors lift identically weighted large and small cubes which typically elicit expectation-based fingertip force errors. One group of participants observed the standard overestimation and underestimation-style errors that characterise early lifts with these cubes (Error video--EV). Another group watched the same actors performing the well-adapted error-free lifts that characterise later, well-practiced lifts with these cubes (No error video--NEV). We then examined actual object lifting performance in the subjects who watched the EV and NEV. Despite having similar cognitive expectations and perceptions of heaviness, the group that watched novice lifters making errors themselves made fewer overestimation-style errors than those who watched the expert lifts. To determine how the observation of errors alters cortico-spinal excitability, we measured motor evoked potentials in separate group of participants while they passively observed these EV and NEV. Here, we noted a novel size-based modulation of cortico-spinal excitability when observing the expert lifts, which was eradicated when watching errors. Together, these findings suggest that individuals' sensorimotor systems are sensitive to the subtle visual differences between observing novice and expert performance.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action observation; Grip force error; Motor learning; Object lifting; Size-weight illusion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23953062     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  12 in total

1.  Locomotor adaptation is modulated by observing the actions of others.

Authors:  Mitesh Patel; R Edward Roberts; Mohammed U Riyaz; Maroof Ahmed; David Buckwell; Karen Bunday; Hena Ahmad; Diego Kaski; Qadeer Arshad; Adolfo M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions: an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study.

Authors:  Fabiola Fernández-Gutiérrez; Santiago Martínez; Martin A Rube; Benjamin F Cox; Mahsa Fatahi; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; J Graeme Houston; Helen McLeod; Richard D White; Karen French; Mariana Gueorguieva; Erwin Immel; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Somatosensory perceptual training enhances motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Joshua G A Cashaback; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cognitive attribution of the source of an error in object-lifting results in differences in motor generalization.

Authors:  Kelene Fercho; Lee A Baugh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Changes in corticospinal excitability associated with motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Heather R McGregor; Michael Vesia; Cricia Rinchon; Robert Chen; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A mass-density model can account for the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Christian Wolf; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Knut Drewing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction error induced motor contagions in human behaviors.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ikegami; Gowrishankar Ganesh; Tatsuya Takeuchi; Hiroki Nakamoto
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  The effect of observing novice and expert performance on acquisition of surgical skills on a robotic platform.

Authors:  David J Harris; Samuel J Vine; Mark R Wilson; John S McGrath; Marie-Eve LeBel; Gavin Buckingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual delay affects force scaling and weight perception during object lifting in virtual reality.

Authors:  Vonne van Polanen; Robert Tibold; Atsuo Nuruki; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.