Kieran Barr1, Rohan W Essex, Susie Liu, Tim Henderson. 1. Australian National University Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To compare the trichiasis recurrence rate following bilamellar tarsal rotation or anterior lamellar repositioning, performed as primary surgery for trachomatous trichiasis. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: All cases of trachomatous trichiasis undergoing primary surgical correction at Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia, between 1 June 2001 and 11 June 2011 were included. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. Key baseline, operative and outcome details were collected from the notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Recurrent trichiasis was defined as one or more lashes touching the cornea, resulting in recurrent symptoms of trichiasis and warranting further surgery in the opinion of the treating ophthalmologist. RESULTS: Sixty-seven BTR and eighteen ALR procedures were performed, with BTR being performed from 2001 to 2008, and ALR from 2008 to 2011. The mean follow-up times were significantly different for the BTR group (1654 days) and for the ALR group (673 days)(P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal any significant differences in recurrence rate between the two procedures overall (P = 0.935). Analysis of the 2008 calendar year (the only year where both procedures were performed and therefore had equal follow-up times) suggested that ALR might have a lower recurrence rate (1/10 ALR recurrences vs. 4/6 BTR recurrences, P = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: The results do not demonstrate a difference in the recurrence rate between the two techniques. Inconsistent follow times however leave uncertainty in this result, and a larger prospective randomised study is warranted to address this question.
BACKGROUND: To compare the trichiasis recurrence rate following bilamellar tarsal rotation or anterior lamellar repositioning, performed as primary surgery for trachomatous trichiasis. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: All cases of trachomatous trichiasis undergoing primary surgical correction at Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia, between 1 June 2001 and 11 June 2011 were included. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. Key baseline, operative and outcome details were collected from the notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Recurrent trichiasis was defined as one or more lashes touching the cornea, resulting in recurrent symptoms of trichiasis and warranting further surgery in the opinion of the treating ophthalmologist. RESULTS: Sixty-seven BTR and eighteen ALR procedures were performed, with BTR being performed from 2001 to 2008, and ALR from 2008 to 2011. The mean follow-up times were significantly different for the BTR group (1654 days) and for the ALR group (673 days)(P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal any significant differences in recurrence rate between the two procedures overall (P = 0.935). Analysis of the 2008 calendar year (the only year where both procedures were performed and therefore had equal follow-up times) suggested that ALR might have a lower recurrence rate (1/10 ALR recurrences vs. 4/6 BTR recurrences, P = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: The results do not demonstrate a difference in the recurrence rate between the two techniques. Inconsistent follow times however leave uncertainty in this result, and a larger prospective randomised study is warranted to address this question.