| Literature DB >> 23950758 |
Tanya M Duncan1, Mark D Rausher.
Abstract
Plants that are highly selfing typically exhibit a suite of morphological traits termed a "selfing syndrome," including reduced corollas and reproductive structures, loss of corolla pigmentation, little anther-stigma separation, and a lower pollen/ovule (P/O) ratio. While it is typically assumed that these changes are adaptive, few attempts have been made to determine whether they result from the operation of natural selection or genetic drift. In the southeastern United States, Ipomoea lacunosa has evolved a typical selfing syndrome compared to its close relative, Ipomoea cordatotriloba. Microsatellite markers confirmed that selfing rates are substantially higher in I. lacunosa. Furthermore, using a standard QST - FST comparison, we evaluated the relative importance of selection and drift in the evolution of selfing syndrome traits in I. lacunosa. The analysis demonstrated that natural selection is responsible for the evolution of reduced corolla size, anther-stigma distance, and style length in this species. By contrast, leaf characteristics unrelated to selfing were found to have diverged largely by genetic drift. Our study provides one of the first confirmations that natural selection drives the evolution of selfing-syndrome traits.Entities:
Keywords: Ipomoea cordatotriloba; Ipomoea lacunosa; genetic drift; natural selection; selfing syndrome
Year: 2013 PMID: 23950758 PMCID: PMC3738867 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Schematic of corolla measurements. In the figure anthers and stigma are not touching (anther-stigma distance = 1). Figure adapted from Abel and Austin (1981).
Measures of genetic diversity and selfing rate for 7 populations of .
| cle1 | 18 | 2 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.03 | 0.33 | 0.95 |
| c7 | 13 | 4 | 3.0 (1.4) | 0.61 | 0.55 | −0.24 |
| c13 | 23 | 2 | 2.5 (0.7) | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.92 |
| cl4 | 12 | 3 | 2.7 (1.2) | 0.06 | 0.43 | 0.93 |
| c22 | 8 | 4 | 2.5 (0.6) | 0.50 | 0.43 | −0.39 |
| c29 | 6 | 1 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.00 |
| clela3 | 17 | 2 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.18 | 0.50 | 0.78 |
| la3 | 14 | 1 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.00 | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| la15 | 14 | 2 | 4.0 (0.0) | 0.04 | 0.37 | 0.94 |
| lela8 | 31 | 2 | 2.5 (0.7) | 0.05 | 0.26 | 0.89 |
| la43 | 8 | 2 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.00 | 0.38 | 1.00 |
| la30 | 14 | 2 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.89 |
| la35 | 16 | 2 | 3.0 (1.4) | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.92 |
| la7 | 6 | 1 | 2.0 (0.0) | 0.00 | 0.30 | 1.00 |
| ula7 | 6 | 1 | 3.0 (0.0) | 0.00 | 0.55 | 1.00 |
N, sample size; NPL, number of polymorphic loci; A, mean (sd) number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; s, selfing rate.
Mean ± SD for morphological measurements for populations of .
| 1 | cle1 | 10 | 25.50 ± 1.96 | 29.00 ± 1.18 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 16.20 ± 0.75 | 41.40 ± 10.97 | 43.60 ± 17.28 | 1.01 ± 0.18 | |
| 2 | c7 | 5 | 21.60 ± 0.49 | 29.80 ± 10.33 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 16.80 ± 0.75 | 25.20 ± 6.52 | 24.20 ± 6.52 | 1.10 ± 0.25 | |
| 3 | c13 | 20 | 21.60 ± 1.81 | 28.23 ± 2.99 | 0.77 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.40 | 15.74 ± 1.56 | 41.73 ± 10.64 | 37.68 ± 10.68 | 1.13 ± 0.20 | |
| 4 | cl4 | 14 | 26.71 ± 2.46 | 32.57 ± 2.44 | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 0.86 ± 0.34 | 16.21 ± 1.11 | 50.07 ± 9.69 | 38.79 ± 8.78 | 1.30 ± 0.13 | |
| 5 | c22 | 6 | 27.57 ± 2.04 | 32.07 ± 2.06 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.23 | 17.50 ± 1.16 | 39.71 ± 4.27 | 39.00 ± 7.31 | 1.04 ± 0.11 | |
| 6 | clela3 | 20 | 24.90 ± 2.78 | 30.65 ± 2.46 | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 0.68 ± 0.40 | 16.55 ± 1.0 | 53.33 ± 14.28 | 46.03 ± 11.77 | 1.18 ± 0.26 | |
| 7 | c29 | 8 | 32.63 ± 1.88 | 36.63 ± 2.06 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.43 | 19.88 ± 0.93 | 52.44 ± 11.94 | 47.94 ± 12.42 | 1.13 ± 0.24 | |
| 8 | la3 | 19 | 15.44 ± 1.21 | 12.94 ± 1.03 | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 8.17 ± 0.50 | 48.17 ± 9.31 | 37.50 ± 8.67 | 1.30 ± 0.10 | |
| 9 | la15 | 20 | 17.48 ± 1.12 | 14.85 ± 1.19 | 1.18 ± 0.08 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 10.02 ± 0.53 | 31.65 ± 11.93 | 24.45 ± 11.35 | 1.38 ± 0.24 | |
| 10 | lela8 | 16 | 15.56 ± 1.94 | 15.00 ± 1.70 | 1.04 ± 0.11 | 0.09 ± 0.21 | 9.25 ± 0.66 | 34.72 ± 11.73 | 28.22 ± 10.73 | 1.30 ± 0.28 | |
| 11 | la43 | 29 | 18.14 ± 1.88 | 16.17 ± 1.34 | 1.23 ± 0.14 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 10.54 ± 1.08 | 56.86 ± 25.42 | 43.76 ± 20.87 | 1.42 ± 0.72 | |
| 12 | ula7 | 18 | 18.34 ± 1.70 | 16.68 ± 1.75 | 1.11 ± 0.10 | 0.15 ± 0.23 | 11.16 ± 1.18 | 35.11 ± 14.16 | 26.10 ± 12.18 | 1.38 ± 0.21 |
Figure 2Relationship across populations between selfing rate (s) and anther-stigma distance and style length. The best-fit surface is specified by s = 1.482 + 0.818 asd −0.0054 style length2 [R2 = 0.79, F(2, 9) = 16.58, p < 0.001]; Significance of asd: F(1, 9) = 11.63, p = 0.0077. Significance of style length2: F(1, 9) = 31.36, p = 0.0003. Red points: I. cordatotriloba. Blue points: I. lacunosa. The two figures are different views of the same relationship.
Figure 3.
The average phenotypic correlations ± standard error between pairs of measured traits within populations of .
| Corolla length | |||||||
| Corolla width | 0.36 ± 0.23 | ||||||
| Corolla length/width | 0.56 ± 0.20 | −0.43 ± 0.36 | |||||
| Anther-stigma distance | −0.03 ± 0.16 | −0.03 ± 0.29 | 0.00 ± 0.23 | ||||
| Style length | 0.20 ± 0.33 | 0.28 ± 0.25 | 0.04 ± 0.33 | 0.07 ± 0.19 | |||
| Leaf length | −0.02 ± 0.28 | 0.08 ± 0.36 | −0.10 ± 0.38 | 0.08 ± 0.28 | −0.04 ± 0.35 | ||
| Leaf width | −0.04 ± 0.32 | 0.17 ± 0.28 | −0.15 ± 0.23 | 0.07 ± 0.31 | −0.10 ± 0.44 | 0.79 ± 0.22 | |
| Leaf length/width | −0.10 ± 0.20 | −0.05 ± 0.36 | 0.04 ± 0.26 | 0.00 ± 0.23 | 0.12 ± 0.36 | −0.06 ± 0.38 | 0.43 ± 0.43 |
Figure 4.
Figure 5Orange bars indicate portion of red bar that does not overlap blue bar.