Literature DB >> 23950126

Draft genome sequences for three mercury-methylating, sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Steven D Brown1, Richard A Hurt, Cynthia C Gilmour, Dwayne A Elias.   

Abstract

The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation has been described recently. For insights into the physiology of mercury-methylating bacteria, we present genome sequences for Desulfococcus multivorans strain DSM 2059, Desulfovibrio alkalitolerans strain DSM 16529, and Desulfovibrio species strain X2.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23950126      PMCID: PMC3744682          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00618-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Select members of the sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and Fe(III)-reducing bacteria (IRB) can methylate inorganic mercury [Hg(II)] to methylmercury (MeHg), a more toxic form that bioaccumulates (1). For the first time, recent genetic studies have linked a specific gene cluster (hgcAB) to mercury methylation in the model SRB Desulfovibrio desulfuricans strain ND132 and IRB Geobacter sulfureducens strain PCA (2). The hgcAB gene cluster encodes a putative corrinoid-containing CO dehydrogenase/acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) synthase, HgcA, and a 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin, HgcB, and these are predicted to have roles as a methyl carrier and an electron donor, respectively. The potential involvement of the acetyl-CoA pathway in bacterial Hg methylation was recognized more than 20 years ago (3), although the physiology and MeHg formation in incomplete-oxidizing SRB (conversion of carbon substrates to acetate) and complete-oxidizing SRB (conversion of carbon to CO2) remain to be fully elucidated (4, 5). The majority of known Hg-methylating Deltaproteobacteria are incomplete oxidizers (6). This means that when they reduce sulfate, these organisms incompletely oxidize short-chain fatty acids to acetate and do not utilize C-1 substrates, and thus they do not use the acetyl-CoA pathway as part of their primary substrate utilization machinery during heterotrophic growth (7). Detailed assessments and comparisons of mercury methylation rates for several Desulfovibrio species that are incomplete oxidizers, including those investigated in this study, have been reported (6, 8). Genome sequences for several SRBs known or predicted to be mercury methylators have been reported (2, 9–12). Desulfovibrio multivorans is an example of a complete oxidizer with an acetyl-CoA pathway, and mercury methylation rates have been reported for several strains (4, 5). D. alkalitolerans strain DSM 16529 is an example of a complete oxidizer that can generate MeHg (8). Desulfovibrio species strain X2 was isolated from soft black mid-Chesapeake Bay bottom sediments sampled in May 1985 (13), and it methylates both Sn(IV) (14) and Hg(II) (6), but its detailed physiology has not been fully assessed. In this study, we generated draft genomes for D. multivorans DSM 2059, D. alkalitolerans DSM 16529, and Desulfovibrio species strain X2. Sequence data for each genome were generated using an Illumina MiSeq instrument (15) and a paired-end approach with an approximate insert library size of 500 bp and read lengths of 250 bp, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The CLC Genomics Workbench (version 6.0.2) was used to trim and filter reads for quality sequence data and subsequent assemblies. The resulting assemblies generated 149, 32, and 66 DNA contigs that represented the draft genome sequences for strains DSM 2059, DSM 16529, and X2, respectively. The estimated genome sizes were ~4.4, 3.2, and 3.9 Mb and G+C DNA contents were 56.8%, 64.4%, and 67.9%, and there were 3,838, 2,924, and 3,445 putative coding sequences (CDS) for DSM 2059, DSM 16529, and X2, respectively. Sequence depth coverage across the genomes was ~205 to 309 times the genome sizes. Draft genome sequences were annotated as previously described (16). The draft genome sequences presented here will facilitate comparative studies and assist with investigations into HgcAB native functions, related pathways, and assessments of MeHg potential in different ecological niches.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers ATHJ00000000, ATHI00000000, and ATHV00000000 for D. multivorans DSM 2059, D. alkalitolerans DSM 16529, and Desulfovibrio species strain X2, respectively. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.
  15 in total

1.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments.

Authors:  J K King; J E Kostka; M E Frischer; F M Saunders
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Anaerobic microbial methylation of inorganic tin in estuarine sediment slurries.

Authors:  C C Gilmour; J H Tuttle; J C Means
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation.

Authors:  Jerry M Parks; Alexander Johs; Mircea Podar; Romain Bridou; Richard A Hurt; Steven D Smith; Stephen J Tomanicek; Yun Qian; Steven D Brown; Craig C Brandt; Anthony V Palumbo; Jeremy C Smith; Judy D Wall; Dwayne A Elias; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Mechanisms regulating mercury bioavailability for methylating microorganisms in the aquatic environment: a critical review.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Katarzyna H Kucharzyk; Tong Zhang; Marc A Deshusses
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Detailed assessment of the kinetics of Hg-cell association, Hg methylation, and methylmercury degradation in several Desulfovibrio species.

Authors:  Andrew M Graham; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew C Maizel; Dwayne A Elias; Cynthia C Gilmour
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Cobalamin-mediated mercury methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS.

Authors:  S C Choi; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Mercury methylation independent of the acetyl-coenzyme A pathway in sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Eileen B Ekstrom; François M M Morel; Janina M Benoit
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Miriam Smith; Paul Coupland; Thomas D Otto; Simon R Harris; Thomas R Connor; Anna Bertoni; Harold P Swerdlow; Yong Gu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genetics and molecular biology of the electron flow for sulfate respiration in desulfovibrio.

Authors:  Kimberly L Keller; Judy D Wall
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Draft Genome Sequence for Desulfovibrio africanus Strain PCS.

Authors:  Steven D Brown; Sagar M Utturkar; Adam P Arkin; Adam M Deutschbauer; Dwayne A Elias; Terry C Hazen; Romy Chakraborty
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2013-04-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Molecular evolution of cytochrome bd oxidases across proteobacterial genomes.

Authors:  Mauro Degli Esposti; Tania Rosas-Pérez; Luis Eduardo Servín-Garcidueñas; Luis Manuel Bolaños; Monica Rosenblueth; Esperanza Martínez-Romero
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.416

2.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria That Produce Exopolymers Thrive in the Calcifying Zone of a Hypersaline Cyanobacterial Mat.

Authors:  Stefan Spring; Dimitry Y Sorokin; Susanne Verbarg; Manfred Rohde; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia.

Authors:  Steven D Brown; Shilpa Nagaraju; Sagar Utturkar; Sashini De Tissera; Simón Segovia; Wayne Mitchell; Miriam L Land; Asela Dassanayake; Michael Köpke
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.040

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.