| Literature DB >> 23949701 |
Michael Adamzik1, Jasmin Broll, Jörg Steinmann, Astrid Maria Westendorf, Irene Rehfeld, Carla Kreissig, Jürgen Peters.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cell therapy may become an option for lung injury treatment. However, no data are available on the alveolar presence and time course of CD4+ CD25 + Foxp3 + T-regulatory lymphocyte cells (Tregs) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Accordingly, we (1) measured the ratio of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Tregs to all (CD4+) lymphocytes in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of ARDS patients and of control subjects without lung disease and (2) assessed their impact on 30-day mortality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23949701 PMCID: PMC7095258 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3036-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0342-4642 Impact factor: 17.440
Characteristics of patients with severe ARDS grouped for survival and non-survival
| Variable | Survivors ( | Non-survivors ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)* | 42 ± 14 | 49 ± 8 | 0.07* |
| Male/female | 19/11 | 13/4 | 0.35* |
| BMI (kg/m2)* | 29 ± 5 | 29 ± 5 | 0.9* |
| CD4 + CD25 + FoxP3 + absolute cell count per μl blood | 13 ± 18 | 9 ± 13 | 0.47 |
| CD4 + CD25+ FoxP3 + absolute cell count per μl BAL | 1.2 ± 2.5 | 1.6 ± 3.4 | 0.65 |
| Leukocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (cell count per μl) | 537 ± 862 | 1003 ± 1447 | 0.15* |
| Lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (cell count per μl) | 20.3 ± 9.3 | 18.7 ± 10.8 | 0.5* |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage (cell count per μl) | 636 ± 106 | 876 ± 196 | 0.35* |
| Recovery volume (ml) | 98 ± 24 | 96 ± 31 | 0.16* |
| LDH in bronchoalveolar lavage (U/l) | 51 ± 57 | 272 ± 458 | 0.009° |
| Albumin concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage (mg/ml) | 0.34 ± 0.39 | 1.15 ± 1.87 | 0.012° |
| Protein concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage (mg/ml) | 0.78 ± 0.8 | 2.43 ± 3.8 | 0.06* |
| Transforming growth factor beta (pg/ml) | 42 ± 78 | 20 ± 43 | 0.25° |
| Interleukin 6 (pg/ml) | 845 ± 2642 | 839 ± 1727 | 0.9° |
| Interleukin 2 receptor alpha (pg/ml) | 121 ± 314 | 69 ± 181 | 0.5° |
| Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (pg/ml) | 9.7 ± 17 | 12.8 ± 24 | 0.6° |
| Interleukin 4 (pg/ml) | 2.7 ± 5.6 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 0.35° |
| Interleukin-12p70 (pg/ml) | 3.5 ± 9.6 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.3° |
| Interleukin 10 (pg/ml) | 20 ± 93 | 40 ± 161 | 0.5° |
| Interferon alfa-2b (pg/ml) | 106 ± 614 | 2 ± 0.5 | 0.47° |
| Interferon beta (pg/ml) | 11.3 ± 26.8 | 5.1 ± 5 | 0.1° |
| Interferon gamma (pg/ml) | 41.3 ± 190 | 70 ± 295 | 0.7° |
| Interleukin-1 beta (pg/ml) | 28.5 ± 70 | 77 ± 167 | 0.1° |
| PO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) | 180 ± 29 | 127 ± 29 | 0.09* |
| Mean airway pressure (mbar) | 27 ± 4 | 27 ± 3 | 0.7* |
| ECMO therapy (yes/no) | 9/21 | 7/10 | 0.4# |
| Lung injury score | 3 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 0.24* |
| CVVHD (yes) | 30 | 17 | 0.9* |
| C-reactive protein concentration (mg/dl)* | 13 ± 9 | 15 ± 10 | 0.4* |
| Procalcitonin concentration (ng/ml)* | 13 ± 31 | 40 ± 60 | 0.1* |
| SAPS II score* | 44 ± 22 | 51 ± 16 | 0.3* |
| Bacterial isolates in BAL | 13 | 10 | 0.4# |
| H1N1 isolates | 17 | 7 |
Data are presented as frequency or mean ± SD
BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, BMI body mass index, CVVHD continuous hemofiltration/dialysis, ECMO extracorporal membrane oxygenation, SAPS II Simplified Acute Physiology Score, H1N1 influenza A virus H1N1
* p value based on Student’s t test
# p values based on chi-square tests
° p value based on Mann-Whitney U test
Fig. 1Representative FACS analysis with staining of CD25/FoxP3-coexpressing CD4+ T cells. The upper left panel shows a scatter plot where a forward versus a side scatter is used to exclude debris. As shown in the upper right panel, we gated the CD4-positive cells (circle) as a subpopulation of leukocytes. As depicted in the lower left panel, we checked whether the gate was set correctly. The upper right quadrant of the latter panel shows the subpopulation of CD4+ lymphocytes coexpressing FoxP3. Eventually, as depicted in the lower right panel we examined only CD4-positive cells (shown in the circle of the upper right panel) to detect CD25 and FoxP3 coexpression, as shown in the upper right quadrant of the lower right panel
Correlations between the CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Tregs to CD4+ lymphocyte ratio and the cytokine concentrations in the bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with ARDS
| Pearson‘s correlation coefficient |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Transforming growth factor beta (pg/ml) | 0.83 | 0.5 |
| Interleukin 2 receptor alpha(pg/ml) | 0.7 | 0.0001 |
| Interleukin-12p70 (pg/ml) | 0.22 | 0.09 |
| Interleukin 4 (pg/ml) | −0.021 | 0.9 |
| Interleukin 10 (pg/ml) | 0.32 | 0.01 |
| Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (pg/ml) | 0.7 | 0.0001 |
| Interleukin 6 (pg/ml) | −0.17 | 0.2 |
| Interferon alfa-2b (pg/ml) | 0.043 | 0.001 |
| Interferon beta (pg/ml) | 0.185 | 0.2 |
| Interferon gamma (pg/ml) | 0.47 | 0.0001 |
| Interleukin-1 beta (pg/ml) | −0.049 | 0.7 |
Fig. 2CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Tregs to CD4+ lymphocyte ratio in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of controls and of patients surviving or dying from the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). BALs were obtained within 24 h of the patient admission. Tregs were detected in both controls and ARDS patients. Although the ratios show substantial overlap, the mean ratio of Tregs to all CD4+ cells was greater in ARDS non-survivors than in ARDS survivors or in controls
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier analysis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) depending on the initial CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + (Treg) cell to CD4+ lymphocyte ratio in their bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Survival was 81 % in ARDS patients with a ratio of less than 7.4 % but only 43 % in those with a ratio of 7.4 % or greater (p = 0.005)
Cox regression analysis in patients with ARDS
| (Co) variable | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Restricted | |||
| Hazard ratio (95 % CI) |
| Hazard ratio (95 % CI) |
| |
| Treg/CD4+ cell ratio <7.4 % | 1 | – | 1 | – |
| Treg/CD4+ cell ratio ≥7.4 % | 15 (2–103) | 0.005 | 6.5 (1.7–25) | 0.006 |
| Sex | 4.33 (0.7–24) | 0.095 | 2.2 (0.5–8.7) | 0.26 |
| SAPS II score (per unit) | 1.0 (0.8–1.01) | 0.8 | – | – |
| Lung injury score | 2.5 (0.3–20) | 0.38 | – | – |
| ECMO (no) | 1 | – | – | – |
| ECMO (yes) | 1.01 (0.025–1.2) | 0.069 | 0.3 (0.1–1.1) | 0.053 |
| CVVHD | 0.9 (0.2–3.7) | 0.9 | – | – |
| BMI | 1.01 (0.9–1.2) | 0.6 | – | – |
| C-reactive protein concentration (per log10(mg/dl)) | 1.01 (0.9–1.1) | 0.49 | – | – |
| Procalcitonin concentration (per log10(ng/ml)) | 1.01 (0.025–1.2) | 0.8 | – | – |
Hazard ratio point estimates, 95 % CI, and p values (two-sided) from Wald tests are reported
BMI body mass index, CVVHD continuous hemofiltration/dialysis (), ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, SAPS II Simplified Acute Physiology Score