BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with potentially serious infections, including tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of extensive TB screening and HBV screening prior to initiating TNF-α inhibitors in CD. METHODS: We constructed two Markov models: (1) comparing tuberculin skin test (TST) combined with chest X-ray (conventional TB screening) versus TST and chest X-ray followed by the interferon-gamma release assay (extensive TB screening) in diagnosing TB; and (2) HBV screening versus no HBV screening. Our base-case included an adult CD patient starting with infliximab treatment. Input parameters were extracted from the literature. Direct medical costs were assessed and discounted following a third-party payer perspective. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity and Monte Carlo analyses were performed over wide ranges of probability and cost estimates. RESULTS: At base-case, the ICERs of extensive screening and HBV screening were €64,340 and €75,760 respectively to gain one quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses concluded that extensive TB screening was a cost-effective strategy if the latent TB prevalence is more than 12 % or if the false positivity rate of TST is more than 20 %. HBV screening became cost-effective if HBV reactivation or HBV-related mortality is higher than 37 and 62 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive TB screening and HBV screening are not cost-effective compared with conventional TB screening and no HBV screening, respectively. However, when targeted at high-risk patient groups, these screening strategies are likely to become cost-effective.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with potentially serious infections, including tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of extensive TB screening and HBV screening prior to initiating TNF-α inhibitors in CD. METHODS: We constructed two Markov models: (1) comparing tuberculin skin test (TST) combined with chest X-ray (conventional TB screening) versus TST and chest X-ray followed by the interferon-gamma release assay (extensive TB screening) in diagnosing TB; and (2) HBV screening versus no HBV screening. Our base-case included an adult CD patient starting with infliximab treatment. Input parameters were extracted from the literature. Direct medical costs were assessed and discounted following a third-party payer perspective. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity and Monte Carlo analyses were performed over wide ranges of probability and cost estimates. RESULTS: At base-case, the ICERs of extensive screening and HBV screening were €64,340 and €75,760 respectively to gain one quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses concluded that extensive TB screening was a cost-effective strategy if the latent TB prevalence is more than 12 % or if the false positivity rate of TST is more than 20 %. HBV screening became cost-effective if HBV reactivation or HBV-related mortality is higher than 37 and 62 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive TB screening and HBV screening are not cost-effective compared with conventional TB screening and no HBV screening, respectively. However, when targeted at high-risk patient groups, these screening strategies are likely to become cost-effective.
Authors: Pavol Papay; Alexander Eser; Stefan Winkler; Sophie Frantal; Christian Primas; Wolfgang Miehsler; Gottfried Novacek; Harald Vogelsang; Clemens Dejaco; Walter Reinisch Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Carme Loras; Cristina Saro; Ferràn Gonzalez-Huix; Miguel Mínguez; Olga Merino; Javier P Gisbert; Jesús Barrio; Antonio Bernal; Ana Gutiérrez; Marta Piqueras; Xavier Calvet; Montserrat Andreu; Agueda Abad; Daniel Ginard; Luis Bujanda; Julián Panés; Miquel Torres; Fernando Fernández-Bañares; Josep M Viver; Maria Esteve Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: L Biancone; M Pavia; G Del Vecchio Blanco; R D'Incà; F Castiglione; F De Nigris; P Doldo; F Cosco; P Vavassori; G P Bresci; A Arrigoni; G Cadau; I Monteleone; A Rispo; W Fries; B Mallardi; G C Sturniolo; F Pallone Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Sebastiaan W Polle; Jan Wind; Dirk T Ubbink; Daan W Hommes; Dirk J Gouma; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Elizabeth Salt; Amanda T Wiggins; Mary Kay Rayens; Moises A Huaman; David Mannino; Philip Schwieterman; Scott A Merkley; Allison R Jones; Leslie J Crofford Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne Journal: Gut Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 23.059