Literature DB >> 23949160

Impact of whole-body electromyostimulation on body composition in elderly women at risk for sarcopenia: the Training and ElectroStimulation Trial (TEST-III).

Wolfgang Kemmler1, Michael Bebenek, Klaus Engelke, Simon von Stengel.   

Abstract

Most studies have confirmed the positive impact of resistance training on muscle mass and functional capacity in aging adults. However, due to physical limitation or a simple aversion against regular exercise, the majority of elderly subjects do not reach the exercise doses recommended for impacting strength or muscle mass. This led us to evaluate the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS), a novel, time-efficient and smooth training technology, on body composition with special regard to sarcopenia. Seventy-six lean, non-sportive women (75 ± 4 years) were randomly assigned to either a WB-EMS group (WB-EMS, n = 38) that performed 18 min of WB-EMS (bipolar, 85 Hz) 3 sessions in 14 days (1.5 sessions/week) or a semi-active control group (aCG, n = 38). Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and maximum strength was evaluated using isometric techniques for trunk and legs. After 54 weeks of intervention, significant inter-group differences were determined for appendicular skeletal muscle mass (WB-EMS, 0.4 ± 2.2 % vs. aCG, -1.5 ± 3.1 %; p = 0.009), lean body mass (WB-EMS, 0.8 ± 1.8 % vs. aCG, -0.8 ± 2.7 %; p = 0.008) and maximum isometric strength (leg extensors, 9.8 ± 12.9 % vs. 0.2 ± 10.4 %; p = 0.003; trunk extensors, 10.1 ± 12.7 vs. -1.6 ± 8.6 %; p = 0.001). Although borderline significant for abdominal fat mass (WB-EMS, -2.9 ± 8.3 vs. aCG, 1.5 ± 10.7 %; p = 0.069), differences did not reach statistically significant levels for body fat parameters. Considering the clinical effectiveness for impacting sarcopenia and the good acceptance of this technology by this non-sportive cohort of elderly women, we conclude that for elderly subjects unable or unwilling to perform dynamic strength exercises, electromyostimulation may be a less off-putting alternative to maintain lean body mass and strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23949160      PMCID: PMC3889893          DOI: 10.1007/s11357-013-9575-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age (Dordr)        ISSN: 0161-9152


  35 in total

1.  Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on resting metabolic rate, body composition, and maximum strength in postmenopausal women: the Training and ElectroStimulation Trial.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Rebecca Schliffka; Jerry L Mayhew; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults.

Authors:  Wojtek J Chodzko-Zajko; David N Proctor; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Christopher T Minson; Claudio R Nigg; George J Salem; James S Skinner
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Exercise effects on bone mineral density in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Elisa A Marques; Jorge Mota; Joana Carvalho
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-09-16

Review 4.  Metabolic syndrome--a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation.

Authors:  K G M M Alberti; P Zimmet; J Shaw
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation increases muscle protein synthesis in elderly type 2 diabetic men.

Authors:  Benjamin T Wall; Marlou L Dirks; Lex B Verdijk; Tim Snijders; Dominique Hansen; Pascal Vranckx; Nicholas A Burd; Paul Dendale; Luc J C van Loon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

7.  Assessing risk for the onset of functional dependence among older adults: the role of physical performance.

Authors:  T M Gill; C S Williams; M E Tinetti
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; K Weber; G Volland; N Kashman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 9.  [Prognosis in obesity, what has changed?].

Authors:  H Liebermeister
Journal:  Versicherungsmedizin       Date:  1995-02-01

Review 10.  Sarcopenic obesity: definition, cause and consequences.

Authors:  Sari Stenholm; Tamara B Harris; Taina Rantanen; Marjolein Visser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.294

View more
  34 in total

1.  Whole-body electromyostimulation to fight sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older women at risk. Resultsof the randomized controlled FORMOsA-sarcopenic obesity study.

Authors:  W Kemmler; M Teschler; A Weissenfels; M Bebenek; S von Stengel; M Kohl; E Freiberger; S Goisser; F Jakob; C Sieber; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  New Trend of Physical Activity and Exercise for Health Promotion and Functional Ability.

Authors:  Wonil Park; Hun-Young Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  The effects of whole-body muscle stimulation on body composition and strength parameters: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luiz Rodrigues-Santana; José Carmelo Adsuar; Hugo Louro; Jorge Pérez-Gómez; Miguel Angel Hernández-Mocholí; Jorge Carlos-Vivas; Rossana Gomez-Campos; Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de Campos
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Psychological Effects of Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training: a Controlled Pilot Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Christian Keicher; Lena Pyrkosch; Bernd Wolfarth; Andreas Ströhle
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-06-09

5.  Whole-Body Electromyostimulation to Fight Osteopenia in Elderly Females: The Randomized Controlled Training and Electrostimulation Trial (TEST-III).

Authors:  Simon von Stengel; Michael Bebenek; Klaus Engelke; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2015-02-15

6.  Impact of whole body electromyostimulation on cardiometabolic risk factors in older women with sarcopenic obesity: the randomized controlled FORMOsA-sarcopenic obesity study.

Authors:  Katharina Wittmann; Cornel Sieber; Simon von Stengel; Matthias Kohl; Ellen Freiberger; Franz Jakob; Michael Lell; Klaus Engelke; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Effect of whole-body electromyostimulation and / or protein supplementation on obesity and cardiometabolic risk in older men with sarcopenic obesity: the randomized controlled FranSO trial.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Matthias Kohl; Ellen Freiberger; Cornel Sieber; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Once-Weekly Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Increases Strength, Stability and Body Composition in Amateur Golfers. A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Carina Zink-Rückel; Matthias Kohl; Sebastian Willert; Simon von Stengel; Wolfgang Kemmler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Sarcopenic obesity and complex interventions with nutrition and exercise in community-dwelling older persons--a narrative review.

Authors:  Sabine Goisser; Wolfgang Kemmler; Simone Porzel; Dorothee Volkert; Cornel Christian Sieber; Leo Cornelius Bollheimer; Ellen Freiberger
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus High-Intensity Resistance Exercise on Body Composition and Strength: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Marc Teschler; Anja Weißenfels; Michael Bebenek; Michael Fröhlich; Matthias Kohl; Simon von Stengel
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.