Literature DB >> 2394916

Sample bias in caregiving research.

J R Dura1, J K Kiecolt-Glaser.   

Abstract

Data on subject selection biases in research with older adults are limited. We conducted two sample bias studies that assessed primary caregivers for dementia patients. The first study compared 46 caregivers, who required home interviews, with 63 caregivers willing to travel to the university hospital for assessment; all subjects had been offered free taxi service. Caregivers interviewed at home were helping more hours per day and were more depressed than those assessed at the university; in addition, the patients of caregivers assessed at home were more impaired and had greater personality changes. The second study compared available information from respite care users who chose to participate in our caregiver research project with those who chose not to participate. Nonparticipants provided care for more impaired patients. No demographic differences were found between groups in either study, and there were no differences in the chronicity of caregiving. The implications of these data for aging research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2394916     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/45.5.p200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  10 in total

1.  Confirmatory factor analysis of a brief version of the Zarit Burden Interview in Black and White dementia caregivers.

Authors:  Crystal V Flynn Longmire; Bob G Knight
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-03-14

2.  Effects of Caregiver-Focused Programs on Psychosocial Outcomes in Caregivers of Individuals with ASD: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Yu; John H McGrew; Jorgina Boloor
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-12

3.  Bi-factor analyses of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone.

Authors:  Brandon E Gavett; Paul K Crane; Kristen Dams-O'Connor
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Episodic memory impairment in Addison's disease: results from a telephonic cognitive assessment.

Authors:  Michelle Henry; Kevin G F Thomas; Ian L Ross
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.584

5.  Survey nonresponse among informal caregivers: effects on the presence and magnitude of associations with caregiver burden and satisfaction.

Authors:  Marloes Oldenkamp; Rafael P M Wittek; Mariët Hagedoorn; Ronald P Stolk; Nynke Smidt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Development and validation of the BD SX: a brief measure of mood and symptom variability for use with adults with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Norm O'Rourke; Andrew Sixsmith; David B King; Hamed Yaghoubi-Shahir; Sarah L Canham
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Subjective burden among spousal and adult-child informal caregivers of older adults: results from a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Marloes Oldenkamp; Mariët Hagedoorn; Joris Slaets; Ronald Stolk; Rafael Wittek; Nynke Smidt
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Survey response burden in caregivers of civilians and service members/veterans with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hahn; Phillip A Ianni; Robin A Hanks; Jennifer A Miner; Jenna Freedman; Noelle E Carlozzi
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2019-02-27

9.  Identifying Family and Unpaid Caregivers in Electronic Health Records: Descriptive Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica E Ma; Janet Grubber; Cynthia J Coffman; Virginia Wang; S Nicole Hastings; Kelli D Allen; Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Kasey Decosimo; Joshua Dadolf; Caitlin Sullivan; Nina R Sperber; Courtney H Van Houtven
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-07-18

10.  Validation of two short versions of the Zarit Burden Interview in the palliative care setting: a questionnaire to assess the burden of informal caregivers.

Authors:  Martina B Kühnel; Christina Ramsenthaler; Claudia Bausewein; Martin Fegg; Farina Hodiamont
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.