Literature DB >> 23949094

False negative newborn screen and neonatal cholestasis in a premature child with cystic fibrosis.

J F Heidendael1, M M Tabbers, I De Vreede.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis enables early diagnosis and treatment, leading to better outcomes for patients with cystic fibrosis. Although the sensitivity of several screening protocols is high, false negative screening results of the newborn patient still occur, which can lead to a significant delay in diagnosis when the awareness for presenting symptoms of cystic fibrosis declines. Neonatal cholestasis is one of the presenting symptoms of cystic fibrosis but can be easily missed when total parenteral nutrition has been given. Premature newborns are probably more at risk of a missed underlying diagnosis than term babies because their co-pathologies and management are often more complex. We present a case of a 10-week-old premature boy with a false negative newborn screening for cystic fibrosis, in whom cystic fibrosis presented with neonatal cholestasis. In this case, the immunoreactive trypsinogen/pancreatitis-associated protein/35 cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator mutation analysis/sequencing method was used. Furthermore, an overview of the literature on missed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis due to a false negative newborn screen is provided.
CONCLUSION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) should be considered in infants with neonatal cholestasis even when the newborn screening for CF is reported to be negative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23949094     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-013-2135-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  12 in total

1.  Estimating the annual number of false negative cystic fibrosis newborn screening tests.

Authors:  Adam Fritz; Philip Farrell
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  Novel strategies in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Annette M M Vernooij-van Langen; J Gerard Loeber; Bert Elvers; Ralf H Triepels; Johan J P Gille; Catharina P B Van der Ploeg; Sandra Reijntjens; Edward Dompeling; Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  The need for vigilance: the case of a false-negative newborn screen for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Christina T Dunn; Mary M Skrypek; Amy L R Powers; Theresa A Laguna
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Genetic and clinical features of false-negative infants in a neonatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  R Padoan; S Genoni; E Moretti; M Seia; A Giunta; C Corbetta
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  Biliary infusion therapy in the inspissated bile syndrome of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  J S Evans; D E George; D Mollit
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 6.  Cystic fibrosis in premature infants.

Authors:  K D Lu; C Engmann; F Moya; M Muhlebach
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Factors accounting for a missed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening.

Authors:  Michael J Rock; Hara Levy; Christina Zaleski; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2011-08-24

8.  Improved survival in cystic fibrosis patients diagnosed by newborn screening compared to a historical cohort from the same centre.

Authors:  F Nicole Dijk; Karen McKay; Federica Barzi; Kevin J Gaskin; Dominic A Fitzgerald
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Genetic and physiologic correlates of longitudinal immunoreactive trypsinogen decline in infants with cystic fibrosis identified through newborn screening.

Authors:  Marci K Sontag; Mary Corey; John E Hokanson; Julie A Marshall; Steve S Sommer; Gary O Zerbe; Frank J Accurso
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  European best practice guidelines for cystic fibrosis neonatal screening.

Authors:  Carlo Castellani; Kevin W Southern; Keith Brownlee; Jeannette Dankert Roelse; Alistair Duff; Michael Farrell; Anil Mehta; Anne Munck; Rodney Pollitt; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Bridget Wilcken; Manfred Ballmann; Carlo Corbetta; Isabelle de Monestrol; Philip Farrell; Maria Feilcke; Claude Férec; Silvia Gartner; Kevin Gaskin; Jutta Hammermann; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Gerard Loeber; Milan Macek; Gita Mehta; Andreas Reiman; Paolo Rizzotti; Alec Sammon; Dorota Sands; Alan Smyth; Olaf Sommerburg; Toni Torresani; Georges Travert; Annette Vernooij; Stuart Elborn
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis and drugs used in associated digestive tract diseases.

Authors:  Adriana Haack; Giselle Gonçalves Aragão; Maria Rita Carvalho Garbi Novaes
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Newborn Screening Saves Lives but Cannot Replace the Need for Clinical Vigilance.

Authors:  F Neemuchwala; M Taki; E Secord; S Z Nasr
Journal:  Case Rep Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-02

3.  Clinical complications in children with false-negative results in cystic fibrosis newborn screening.

Authors:  Katarzyna Zybert; Urszula Borawska-Kowalczyk; Lukasz Wozniacki; Malwina Dawidziuk; Mariusz Ołtarzewski; Dorota Sands
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.990

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.