J F Heidendael1, M M Tabbers, I De Vreede. 1. Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Room H7-217, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis enables early diagnosis and treatment, leading to better outcomes for patients with cystic fibrosis. Although the sensitivity of several screening protocols is high, false negative screening results of the newborn patient still occur, which can lead to a significant delay in diagnosis when the awareness for presenting symptoms of cystic fibrosis declines. Neonatal cholestasis is one of the presenting symptoms of cystic fibrosis but can be easily missed when total parenteral nutrition has been given. Premature newborns are probably more at risk of a missed underlying diagnosis than term babies because their co-pathologies and management are often more complex. We present a case of a 10-week-old premature boy with a false negative newborn screening for cystic fibrosis, in whom cystic fibrosis presented with neonatal cholestasis. In this case, the immunoreactive trypsinogen/pancreatitis-associated protein/35 cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator mutation analysis/sequencing method was used. Furthermore, an overview of the literature on missed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis due to a false negative newborn screen is provided. CONCLUSION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) should be considered in infants with neonatal cholestasis even when the newborn screening for CF is reported to be negative.
UNLABELLED: Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis enables early diagnosis and treatment, leading to better outcomes for patients with cystic fibrosis. Although the sensitivity of several screening protocols is high, false negative screening results of the newborn patient still occur, which can lead to a significant delay in diagnosis when the awareness for presenting symptoms of cystic fibrosis declines. Neonatal cholestasis is one of the presenting symptoms of cystic fibrosis but can be easily missed when total parenteral nutrition has been given. Premature newborns are probably more at risk of a missed underlying diagnosis than term babies because their co-pathologies and management are often more complex. We present a case of a 10-week-old premature boy with a false negative newborn screening for cystic fibrosis, in whom cystic fibrosis presented with neonatal cholestasis. In this case, the immunoreactive trypsinogen/pancreatitis-associated protein/35 cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator mutation analysis/sequencing method was used. Furthermore, an overview of the literature on missed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis due to a false negative newborn screen is provided. CONCLUSION:Cystic fibrosis (CF) should be considered in infants with neonatal cholestasis even when the newborn screening for CF is reported to be negative.
Authors: Annette M M Vernooij-van Langen; J Gerard Loeber; Bert Elvers; Ralf H Triepels; Johan J P Gille; Catharina P B Van der Ploeg; Sandra Reijntjens; Edward Dompeling; Jeannette E Dankert-Roelse Journal: Thorax Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Marci K Sontag; Mary Corey; John E Hokanson; Julie A Marshall; Steve S Sommer; Gary O Zerbe; Frank J Accurso Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Carlo Castellani; Kevin W Southern; Keith Brownlee; Jeannette Dankert Roelse; Alistair Duff; Michael Farrell; Anil Mehta; Anne Munck; Rodney Pollitt; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Bridget Wilcken; Manfred Ballmann; Carlo Corbetta; Isabelle de Monestrol; Philip Farrell; Maria Feilcke; Claude Férec; Silvia Gartner; Kevin Gaskin; Jutta Hammermann; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Gerard Loeber; Milan Macek; Gita Mehta; Andreas Reiman; Paolo Rizzotti; Alec Sammon; Dorota Sands; Alan Smyth; Olaf Sommerburg; Toni Torresani; Georges Travert; Annette Vernooij; Stuart Elborn Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 5.482