Literature DB >> 23949018

Three-year randomized clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Batu Can Yaman1, Işil Doğruer2, Burak Gümüştaş2, Begüm Güray Efes3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The clinical suitability of low-shrinkage resin composites for class V cavities has not been investigated in vivo. The purpose of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare the clinical performances of low-shrinkage resin composite Filtek silorane and nanoceramic resin composite Ceram X mono in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over 36 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two calibrated operators restored 144 NCCLs in 24 patients by using Filtek silorane with silorane system adhesive (FS/SSA) and Ceram X mono with Clearfil SE (CXM/CSE) or XP bond (CXM/XPB). Then, two blinded, calibrated evaluators assessed the restorations at the baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months thereafter by using the modified US Public Health Service criteria. Data were analyzed with the Freidman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests at a significance level of 5 % (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: No restoration was associated with postoperative sensitivity or secondary caries. Further, no group showed significant changes until 12 months. The retention rates of the FS/SSA (97.5 %), CXM/CSE (97.5 %), and CXM/XPB (92.31 %) restorations did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). Six (4 CXM/XPB, 1 FS/SSA, and 1 CXM/CSE) of the 121 restorations evaluated at 36 months were completely lost. However, no significant intergroup differences were observed in the other evaluation criteria.
CONCLUSION: The 3-year clinical performances of the restorative materials in NCCLs were not significantly different. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Filtek silorane is suitable for restoring NCCLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23949018     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1079-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  48 in total

1.  Reduction of composite contraction stress through non-bonded microfiller particles.

Authors:  J R Condon; J L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months.

Authors:  Alessandro D Loguercio; Diego Mânica; Franciele Ferneda; Christiana Zander-Grande; Roberto Amaral; Rodrigo Stanislawczuk; Ricardo Marins de Carvalho; Adriana Manso; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Reduced polymerization stress through non-bonded nanofiller particles.

Authors:  John R Condon; Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.

Authors:  Anders Lindberg; Jan W V van Dijken; Marianne Lindberg
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; A Lindberg
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Two-year clinical evaluation of composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Wei Qin; Zhi Song; Yun-Yao Ye; Zheng-Mei Lin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique.

Authors:  E Lutz; I Krejci; T R Oldenburg
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.677

9.  Siloranes in dental composites.

Authors:  Wolfgang Weinmann; Christoph Thalacker; Rainer Guggenberger
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer.

Authors:  J David Eick; Shiva P Kotha; Cecil C Chappelow; Kathleen V Kilway; Gregory J Giese; Alan G Glaros; Charles S Pinzino
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Adhesive strategies in cervical lesions: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fabiana Dias Simas Dreweck; Adrieli Burey; Marcelo de Oliveira Dreweck; Alessandro D Loguercio; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Ladislav Gregor; Lefever Dorien; Tissiana Bortolotto; Albert J Feilzer; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Low-Shrinkage Resin Matrices in Restorative Dentistry-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ebtehal G Albeshir; Rashed Alsahafi; Reem Albluwi; Abdulrahman A Balhaddad; Heba Mitwalli; Thomas W Oates; Gary D Hack; Jirun Sun; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of oxalic acid pre-treatment in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  André Mattos Brito de Souza; Regina Claudia Ramos Colares; Juliano Satori Mendonça; Lidiany Karla Azevedo Rodrigues; Sérgio Lima Santiago
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-09

6.  Bond strengths of silorane- and methacrylate-based composites to various underlying materials.

Authors:  Sezin Ozer; Emine Sen Tunc; Nihan Gonulol
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with nanohybrid, silorane, and fiber reinforced composite: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Priyanka Shripad Bilgi; Nimisha Chinmay Shah; Parth Pinakinbhai Patel; Deepa S Vaid
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

8.  Influence of Different Composites and Polishing Techniques on Periodontal Tissues near Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Controlled, Randomized, Blinded Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nancielli Teixeira; Mariana Benedetti Ferreira Webber; Carlos Augusto Nassar; Veridiana Camilotti; Marcio José Mendonça; Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.