Literature DB >> 23948965

Comparison of dermatophyte PCR kit with conventional methods for detection of dermatophytes in skin specimens.

Nahid Kondori1, Parisa Afshari Tehrani, Louise Strömbeck, Jan Faergemann.   

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of dermatophytosis is usually based on direct microscopic examination and culturing of clinical specimens. A commercial polymerase chain reaction kit (Dermatophyte PCR) has had favorable results when used for detection of dermatophytes and identification of Trichophyton rubrum in nail specimens. This study investigated the efficacy of the Dermatophyte PCR kit for detecting dermatophytosis in 191 hair or skin specimens from patients with suspected dermatophytosis. PCR was positive for 37 % of samples, whereas 31 and 39 % of the specimens were positive by culturing and direct microscopy, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for PCR analysis were 83, 84, 71, and 91 %, respectively. The sensitivity of the PCR test was higher in specimens obtained from skin (88 %) than in those obtained from hair (58 %), while the specificity remained almost the same (84 and 86 % for skin and hair, respectively). Our results show that the Dermatophyte PCR kit is a promising diagnostic tool for detection of dermatophytosis in skin samples, providing clinicians with a rapid diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23948965     DOI: 10.1007/s11046-013-9691-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycopathologia        ISSN: 0301-486X            Impact factor:   2.574


  6 in total

1.  Trapped in keratin; a comparison of dermatophyte detection in nail, skin and hair samples directly from clinical samples using culture and real-time PCR.

Authors:  G J Wisselink; E van Zanten; A M D Kooistra-Smid
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Comparison of a new commercial test, Dermatophyte-PCR kit, with conventional methods for rapid detection and identification of Trichophyton rubrum in nail specimens.

Authors:  Nahid Kondori; Anna-Lena Abrahamsson; Naser Ataollahy; Christine Wennerås
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Five-hour diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections with specific detection of Trichophyton rubrum.

Authors:  Anna Brillowska-Dabrowska; Ditte Marie Saunte; Maiken Cavling Arendrup
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Analysis of the dermatophyte species isolated in the British Isles between 1980 and 2005 and review of worldwide dermatophyte trends over the last three decades.

Authors:  Andrew M Borman; Colin K Campbell; Mark Fraser; Elizabeth M Johnson
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  The dermatophytes.

Authors:  I Weitzman; R C Summerbell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Rapid detection of dermatophytes from skin and hair.

Authors:  Jaya Garg; Ragini Tilak; Atul Garg; Pradyot Prakash; Anil Kumar Gulati; Gopal Nath
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-04-18
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of a Novel Real-Time PCR for Pan-Dermatophyte Detection in Nail Specimens.

Authors:  Jie Gong; Menglong Ran; Xiaowen Wang; Zhe Wan; Ruoyu Li
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 2.  Reappraisal of Conventional Diagnosis for Dermatophytes.

Authors:  Marc Pihet; Yohann Le Govic
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Detection of Dermatophytes from Dermatophytosis-Suspected Cases in Iran, Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Sequencing Method.

Authors:  Akbar Arammehr; Parvin Dehghan; Mostafa Chadeganipour; Maryam Katoueezadeh; Shahla Shadzi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2020-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.