| Literature DB >> 23948740 |
Toshihiko Sugiura1, Hidekazu Ogawa, Noriaki Fukuda, Takaya Moriguchi.
Abstract
The effects of climate change on the taste and textural attributes of foods remain largely unknown, despite much public interest. On the basis of 30-40 years of records, we provide evidence that the taste and textural attributes of apples have changed as a result of recent global warming. Decreases in both acid concentration, fruit firmness and watercore development were observed regardless of the maturity index used for harvest date (e.g., calendar date, number of days after full bloom, peel colour and starch concentration), whereas in some cases the soluble-solids concentration increased; all such changes may have resulted from earlier blooming and higher temperatures during the maturation period. These results suggest that the qualities of apples in the market are undergoing long-term changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23948740 PMCID: PMC3744200 DOI: 10.1038/srep02418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Trends in meteorological values.
The time series of annual air temperature in Nagano (1970–2010) and Aomori (1977–2010) with linear regression lines.
Figure 2Trends in phenological changes.
Time series of (a) bud break date and (b) full bloom date. Lines represent linear regressions.
Figure 3Trends in taste and textural attributes of apples.
Time series of (a) acid concentration, (b) soluble-solids concentration, (c) fruit firmness and (d) watercore rating recorded on 1 November (‘Fuji’) or 1 September (‘Tsugaru’). Lines represent linear regressions.
Summary of mean and temporal changes in taste and textural attributes of apples assessed by using five maturity indexes (calendar date, number of days after full bloom, blush rating, ground colour rating and starch concentration rating) in ‘Fuji’ in Nagano and Aomori and in ‘Tsugaru’ in Nagano
| Mean | Trend | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maturity index | Cultivar | Location | (unit) | (unit) | SE | |||
| (g L−1) | (g L−1year−1) | |||||||
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Nagano | 4.1 | −0.450 | −0.019 | 0.007 | 32 | |
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Aomori | 4.2 | −0.384 | −0.016 | 0.007 | 35 | |
| CD (1 Sep.) | Tsugaru | Nagano | 2.5 | −0.472 | −0.020 | 0.007 | 29 | |
| DAFB (180) | Fuji | Nagano | 4.1 | −0.415 | −0.016 | 0.006 | 32 | |
| DAFB (170) | Fuji | Aomori | 4.2 | −0.393 | −0.014 | 0.006 | 35 | |
| DAFB (120) | Tsugaru | Nagano | 2.5 | −0.411 | −0.014 | 0.006 | 29 | |
| GC (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 4.2 | −0.386 | −0.016 | 0.007 | 32 | |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 4.1 | −0.316 | 0.078 | −0.015 | 0.008 | 32 |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Aomori | 4.2 | −0.191 | 0.360 | −0.012 | 0.013 | 25 |
| SC (2) | Fuji | Aomori | 4.2 | −0.435 | −0.017 | 0.006 | 35 | |
| Average | −0.016 | |||||||
| (°Brix) | (°Brix year−1) | |||||||
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Nagano | 15.1 | 0.364 | 0.024 | 0.010 | 38 | |
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Aomori | 13.8 | 0.459 | 0.028 | 0.009 | 35 | |
| CD (1 Sep.) | Tsugaru | Nagano | 13.2 | 0.219 | 0.254 | 0.020 | 0.017 | 29 |
| DAFB (180) | Fuji | Nagano | 15.0 | 0.294 | 0.074 | 0.018 | 0.010 | 38 |
| DAFB (170) | Fuji | Aomori | 13.8 | 0.329 | 0.054 | 0.024 | 0.013 | 35 |
| DAFB (120) | Tsugaru | Nagano | 13.0 | 0.076 | 0.694 | 0.006 | 0.015 | 29 |
| GC (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 14.8 | 0.346 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 38 | |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 15.0 | 0.226 | 0.171 | 0.016 | 0.011 | 38 |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Aomori | 13.5 | 0.189 | 0.364 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 25 |
| SC (2) | Fuji | Aomori | 13.9 | 0.440 | 0.036 | 0.013 | 35 | |
| Average | 0.021 | |||||||
| (kg) | (kg year−1) | |||||||
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Nagano | 6.4 | −0.610 | −0.026 | 0.005 | 41 | |
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Aomori | 7.0 | −0.119 | 0.496 | −0.004 | 0.006 | 35 |
| CD (1 Sep.) | Tsugaru | Nagano | 5.5 | −0.595 | −0.033 | 0.009 | 29 | |
| DAFB (180) | Fuji | Nagano | 6.4 | −0.587 | −0.023 | 0.005 | 41 | |
| DAFB (170) | Fuji | Aomori | 7.0 | −0.040 | 0.820 | −0.001 | 0.006 | 35 |
| DAFB (120) | Tsugaru | Nagano | 5.6 | −0.467 | −0.022 | 0.008 | 29 | |
| GC (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 6.5 | −0.577 | −0.027 | 0.006 | 40 | |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 6.4 | −0.537 | −0.024 | 0.006 | 41 | |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Aomori | 7.2 | −0.404 | −0.019 | 0.009 | 25 | |
| SC (2) | Fuji | Aomori | 6.9 | −0.204 | 0.240 | −0.007 | 0.006 | 35 |
| Average | −0.019 | |||||||
| (year−1) | ||||||||
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Nagano | 1.1 | −0.56 | −0.034 | 0.005 | 30 | |
| CD (1 Nov.) | Fuji | Aomori | 2.2 | −0.34 | −0.017 | 0.008 | 35 | |
| DAFB (180) | Fuji | Nagano | 1.0 | −0.60 | −0.039 | 0.010 | 30 | |
| DAFB (170) | Fuji | Aomori | 2.1 | −0.34 | −0.023 | 0.012 | 35 | |
| GC (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 1.9 | −0.543 | −0.032 | 0.009 | 30 | |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Nagano | 1.9 | −0.730 | −0.046 | 0.008 | 30 | |
| BL (3) | Fuji | Aomori | 1.6 | −0.258 | 0.213 | −0.020 | 0.016 | 25 |
| SC (2) | Fuji | Aomori | 2.3 | −0.206 | 0.235 | −0.012 | 0.010 | 35 |
| Average | −0.028 | |||||||
Pearson correlation coefficient between each quality value and time (r), P value of r (P), slope of linear regression (Trend), standard error of the Trend (SE) and number of observation years (n). Maturity index column denotes calendar date (CD), number of days after full bloom (DAFB), ground colour rating (GC), blush rating (BL), and starch concentration rating (SC). Benchmark value is given in parenthesis in the maturity index column. Significant P values are in bold (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Phenological responses to temperature.
Relationship between (a) bud break date and mean air temperature in March and (b) full bloom date and mean air temperature in March–April. Lines represent linear regressions.
Figure 5Responses of taste and textural attributes or maturity indexes in apples to mean temperatures during the maturation period, which is 110–180 (‘Fuji’ in Nagano), 100–170 (‘Fuji’ in Aomori) or 90–120 (‘Tsugaru’) days after full bloom.
Relationships between mean temperature during the maturation period and (a) acid concentration, (b) firmness in Nagano and (c) watercore rating of fruit on 180 (‘Fuji’ in Nagano), 170 (‘Fuji’ in Aomori) and 120 (‘Tsugaru’) days after full bloom, all of which showed significant temporal trends (Table 1). Lines represent linear regressions with regression formulae.